From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wilson Bustos Subject: Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 22:59:41 -0300 Message-ID: References: <87ftk4hbhu.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000028b89c05945c8682" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48754) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iHenG-0003Ai-RA for Guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 22:00:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iHenC-0001DI-GD for Guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 22:00:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Jesse Gibbons Cc: Guix-devel , GNU Guix maintainers --00000000000028b89c05945c8682 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Just for curiosity, about this: "Yet, we must also acknowledge that Stallman=E2=80=99s behavior over the ye= ars has undermined a core value of the GNU project" Which 'behavior' are you exactly talking about? What is the reason of that statement? What you want to get with that? Regards! El lun., 7 oct. 2019 a las 21:25, Jesse Gibbons () escribi=C3=B3: > On Mon, 2019-10-07 at 16:32 +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > > Hello Guix! > > > > We, a group of GNU maintainers sharing a vision for a stronger GNU > > Project, are publishing this statement today: > > > > https://guix.gnu.org/blog/2019/joint-statement-on-the-gnu-project/ > > > > We are somewhat abusing the Guix blog here, for lack of a better place, > > but OTOH the future of GNU is obviously relevant to Guix. (Ricardo and > > I started this initiative before Tobias, Maxim, and Marius were > > on-board.) > > > > This mailing list is maybe not the best place to discuss this in detail > > but your local GNU maintainers will surely be happy to answer any > > questions you may have. :-) > > > > Ludo=E2=80=99. > Is there an alternative list where we can have an in-depth discussion? > > --00000000000028b89c05945c8682 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Just for curiosity, about this:
&qu= ot;Yet, we must also acknowledge that Stallman=E2=80=99s behavior over the = years has undermined a core value of the GNU project"

Which = 9;behavior' are you exactly talking about?
What is the reason = of that statement?
What you want to get with that?

Re= gards!

El lun., 7 oct. 2019 a las 21:25, Jesse Gibbons (<jgibbons2357@gmail.com>) escribi=C3=B3= :
On Mon, 2019-1= 0-07 at 16:32 +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
> Hello Guix!
>
> We, a group of GNU maintainers sharing a vision for a stronger GNU
> Project, are publishing this statement today:
>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0https://guix.gnu.= org/blog/2019/joint-statement-on-the-gnu-project/
>
> We are somewhat abusing the Guix blog here, for lack of a better place= ,
> but OTOH the future of GNU is obviously relevant to Guix.=C2=A0 (Ricar= do and
> I started this initiative before Tobias, Maxim, and Marius were
> on-board.)
>
> This mailing list is maybe not the best place to discuss this in detai= l
> but your local GNU maintainers will surely be happy to answer any
> questions you may have.=C2=A0 :-)
>
> Ludo=E2=80=99.
Is there an alternative list where we can have an in-depth discussion?

--00000000000028b89c05945c8682--