From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id yHuzMAxpeWT0PAEASxT56A (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 02 Jun 2023 05:59:08 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS id oDWqLwxpeWTxzAAAG6o9tA (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 02 Jun 2023 05:59:08 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97EDB317FF for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2023 05:59:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q4vwC-0002SB-00; Thu, 01 Jun 2023 23:58:52 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q4vwB-0002S2-4D for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jun 2023 23:58:51 -0400 Received: from sail-ipv4.us-core.com ([208.82.101.137]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q4vw9-0004tT-G5 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jun 2023 23:58:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=2017; bh=Sgek2T+vS98iltZ 3PfIxNiQW1uBjCSRBMYXSBEDavGA=; h=cc:to:subject:date:from:in-reply-to: references; d=lease-up.com; b=oMMyYXs6+b4bIy17W4oNKlJ5dBAFqD9hAJ4vNM36 WJAi1UF6CU9GYLguFenpp+E6Jp5Z6sipD//CEZwreYn0U5pEsRQq2RvpUvGQAeYE0I0Oid uVCemNQcclq3Udn1N+D33D62DGmyJRCza/qiKX6/Bx79Fd0afKBSFwplwtRYY= Received: by sail-ipv4.us-core.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id cb6466d3 (TLSv1.3:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:256:NO) for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2023 03:58:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf1-f52.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-4f4f89f71b8so2150216e87.3 for ; Thu, 01 Jun 2023 20:58:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDx5ejC40GsLcnWuimJK9ksw4OPkBaJDJNe0ESv0yPD0ZnGh+5HE nzWUnwES7DV+feWt5hVMeYpo9sy4P1SZMwzoFmg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4r5/iaPK1iLV2oOH8M3lB+pW0qTdtDq73TLfh+ayy4GnX57lqVUZYEBfhMLUvVj883rK5s+HBMDomRV1WKx3E= X-Received: by 2002:a19:7604:0:b0:4f4:b0a1:9956 with SMTP id c4-20020a197604000000b004f4b0a19956mr1084969lff.7.1685678321825; Thu, 01 Jun 2023 20:58:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87edmwqs68.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> <87353bq6nb.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> In-Reply-To: <87353bq6nb.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 20:58:05 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: qtbase 6.3.2 FTBFS To: Josselin Poiret Cc: Andreas Enge , Guix Devel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=208.82.101.137; envelope-from=felix.lechner@lease-up.com; helo=sail-ipv4.us-core.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Felix Lechner From: Felix Lechner via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1685678348; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=IxjQpxUE38+pkoA9wJ4gwaNxR4JZAuFv19lR9+prJ6oFDPPauIu5J4UpaHTn02VrPFtbKZ iH6x2YTaRxdq2r2TCN5I5RCqI6zf9PBLs6tTTAHx70bStayfQwXCTvnlmbj7SbRWUfduwp E8HlOeHGlsqj2pI9l9Pn2/QsECz9fP7kykfOcClCWOyD4CY3wvDguJwZT/tpgna8djR19h KFFO8WlMXHpOYnTRCMam0cAMriR0mtRzBSzRzmif+rZD3Amzam3lylU4tjKCC/1PGG6Gy1 Tj/5+PNjJTRDCI3aoh/tN/GIYDtgB9ccHR8oXyKL/8ytEm0gbVEsUETK0geQww== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=lease-up.com header.s=2017 header.b=oMMyYXs6; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1685678348; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=G6i94XWjvLGP8t2kKnCmedb8/bOmilAUyFcLErIIWlQ=; b=tLtjzfmgQO1N6S8cPGbGzkcMYWgxzgKntvhJClLSE9lxWkBfvwqIvExz7vpZJKzItHOmSD T4+8Y//NXcjglc72JQFYyMcjoZ6IwSX7PRDkgF5fCuB6btYFFJWGRILRbcJYVSqFJ+mgQ6 m+MQ+FB+x6Oaih/MmSVOgnaHDxuOuJ9WP6ytTcsMYIxFyFPHuySW8cyw2CjqRdd1vuTgsf 2tk1MiWz9hhOHV9j9j82D98LPWq1WAl9gYyLq3+QeM+jBS1pb/lfVZX+zJtil4BpFkEvau lJMo3ZZDHpAXXcw5CMeipk25/geDblGkrP3GGzfeRfgZBLTJ6EMJpL1oOdfJIQ== Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=lease-up.com header.s=2017 header.b=oMMyYXs6; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.97 X-Spam-Score: -3.97 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 97EDB317FF X-TUID: vRkoe+pAS/3O Hi Josselin, On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 1:17=E2=80=AFPM Josselin Poiret wr= ote: > > It could be a transient failure > as well, which should probably be fixed then (unless it's something like > OOM). Having seen the same error locally with three different generations, the failure does not strike me as transient. Maybe it's the other channel? As for an out-of-memory scenario, it's always a possibility but this particular equipment was rebooted two days ago and has 44 GB of combined RAM and swap. There was also no obvious sign of swap activity. Kind regards Felix * * * $ uptime 20:52:20 up 2 days 21:05, 0 users, load average: 0.96, 1.06, 0.98 $ cat /proc/meminfo MemTotal: 28657964 kB MemFree: 12833128 kB MemAvailable: 20422296 kB Buffers: 1031604 kB Cached: 7104156 kB SwapCached: 0 kB Active: 3573924 kB Inactive: 10087916 kB Active(anon): 6632 kB Inactive(anon): 6520256 kB Active(file): 3567292 kB Inactive(file): 3567660 kB Unevictable: 867160 kB Mlocked: 26080 kB SwapTotal: 16777212 kB SwapFree: 16777212 kB