From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id OHspHpS81mP65gAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 19:36:04 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id 6LrpHZS81mNJdQEAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 19:36:04 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52FB03AECA for ; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 19:36:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pMCWg-00047N-1T; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 13:35:38 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pMCWY-00046Q-Lf; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 13:35:35 -0500 Received: from sail-ipv4.us-core.com ([208.82.101.137]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pMCWW-0007b8-AI; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 13:35:30 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=2017; bh=kGnwDWmVyIq7S+f Zu8l80t6AW6f+D2JmYwlJxXzgKcw=; h=cc:to:subject:date:from:in-reply-to: references; d=lease-up.com; b=D1uMzl8IPKi8Z8VOHhEFwHS1RiIdTq6eppfBOTRC chOa+CWraLGDo6WLm2lgaPzSkUfErYe8zGVGlqkg3aHTGwStBvZQz1fZ/c3n4EHYlzMWy6 c8et+mey2PNmEpoiLuwrhFY2hdMFtXGpwETohNrqR8WeVuEzlg1VxVJrJzdfI= Received: by sail-ipv4.us-core.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 90212276 (TLSv1.3:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:256:NO); Sun, 29 Jan 2023 18:35:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf1-f41.google.com with SMTP id v17so10099189lfd.7; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 10:35:18 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kqilx+4nz3HKnksgtqHnwwXI3xiyehKvAomj+fhrdXX9uaaFoD3 TY+O2a7wPCNIqJvi72P1fg5D7VwTIyAXAtInddc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXumZb9n0G2kFIyqpBcf8+OiLPQOoG0h9M/wAhj3wz0oei/s3GlC1IwZHRi40Ajje1esyJsVuZt6czCsZ/HUBZ0= X-Received: by 2002:a19:551a:0:b0:4b5:9be4:ed56 with SMTP id n26-20020a19551a000000b004b59be4ed56mr2953493lfe.19.1675017316795; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 10:35:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87lell2qgc.fsf@inria.fr> In-Reply-To: <87lell2qgc.fsf@inria.fr> Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2023 10:34:40 -0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Resurrecting top-notch continuous integration for Guile To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, guile-devel@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=208.82.101.137; envelope-from=felix.lechner@lease-up.com; helo=sail-ipv4.us-core.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Felix Lechner From: Felix Lechner via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1675017364; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=kGnwDWmVyIq7S+fZu8l80t6AW6f+D2JmYwlJxXzgKcw=; b=Imu0hr9tPYy990zb+e2vwMVBkpTY7Tv9TVxmgZM663Rw9UzpHWGGZWhYx6pd8YlkUAJJMc xEUFH9IEgVFFgWSUIwBnzCw7m6R0v6dw/2BZeTVpUojEP/8oBtsCmr8tQ6vpyZHJr8ebC6 0Y+mmhV8hF2IaepT71qJGsViJoSh5Rd/hyRZUlE32U5CqgygAnqNBHoWKTSK26FTTeNehK KTeXdkdU47/wOIVUV+PWFRoU1WFuZm+eMLPvHrOPJLRhuKi2oKO8iwyBtvCQx1Pzs8A84e Ebzqg4dgdnx0Gb0j5/qrVGY+PYiPeE87/g0ZPuRrjOtxrhM2uFKDPipEqI98hw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=lease-up.com header.s=2017 header.b=D1uMzl8I; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1675017364; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=GbBE4ZmcJPmlIaN9Z2kkaOdJi1kHzbI4V9/QaIuBW/SS7bWi4TbOLxveEvj4OSLISMznfs HhGBClPlKPkqRjDrM1wkm0orZrWCfgZNqzKueJM9wyGN+HojB+7jSljkrTFBfJh8BN1/qP bXgHy/RBKBoO47Rh+Q7bKt1XtfYF05yx1ZEWffhm5B3FwhFf/2OSVwiAJq+jHzibOoMtb9 HbMHnzVLECYMpn1OPbA60eMiEKflcQhq6PwCxdfUTQHDVpHPjV+hDbUVsQSdoeY2kjBoaE oEgXRJMN0WY6fv3+xMn/cGhVtWXtMwI1kR8tDftJIeMxdBTdFgYZPZxZCEFGnA== Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=lease-up.com header.s=2017 header.b=D1uMzl8I; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.18 X-Spam-Score: -4.18 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 52FB03AECA X-TUID: ozmq7NxQAqtJ Hi Ludo' On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 9:37 AM Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > > I hereby ask fellow Guix hackers to voice any > concerns they may have regarding this use of project resources. I am not a Guix hacker (although maybe every user is one too) and, as a newbie, I cannot speak for the group but the Guix project is built on Guile and depends on Guile functioning properly. I cannot imagine any opposition whatsoever. The way I see it, Guixers are more likely to celebrate your proposal as a welcome milestone in the continuous evolution of Guix and Nix. > If there are no objections, I=E2=80=99ll merge this > branch into =E2=80=9Cmain=E2=80=9D. As it stands, Guix owes a profound debt of gratitude to Guile and its developers. There is no reason to wait. Thank you for your expert stewardship in designing the OS we all love so mu= ch! Kind regards Felix