From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Enhance USB install
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 15:31:49 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEwRq=rsg7BrE7cgKz1u3uV4BT9i2EmBSxobjehtq_qU9NaVug@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1468419848-15393-1-git-send-email-vincent.legoll@gmail.com>
	<1468419848-15393-2-git-send-email-vincent.legoll@gmail.com>
	<877fc88s0g.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49159)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <vincent.legoll@gmail.com>) id 1bS2Sf-0004z2-Br
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 09:31:57 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <vincent.legoll@gmail.com>) id 1bS2Se-00030q-FJ
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 09:31:53 -0400
In-Reply-To: <877fc88s0g.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>, Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@idgrilles.fr>

> I took a slightly different approach in commit
> debc6360e111e8efc8a938b2aef28e5b3616ada8, where I essentially copied the
> text from =E2=80=9CBinary Installation=E2=80=9D.

OK, I saw that duplication, but only after I sent the patch for review...

> I=E2=80=99ll comment on the rest later.

Thanks

--=20
Vincent Legoll