From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vincent Legoll Subject: Re: swap activation of guix system when swap is already active Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 08:44:56 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37525) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAWE8-0002N4-8T for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 May 2017 02:45:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAWE7-0006fh-Jc for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 May 2017 02:45:00 -0400 Received: from mail-qk0-x231.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c09::231]:35893) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAWE7-0006fI-Ex for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 May 2017 02:44:59 -0400 Received: by mail-qk0-x231.google.com with SMTP id u75so118189156qka.3 for ; Mon, 15 May 2017 23:44:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: ng0 Cc: guix-devel > Shouldn't we 'swapoff' before 'swapon' so that the device can be 'swapon' in > the system generation? If you do that after checking that the swap device / file is already on, you cloud also just do nothing then, I'm not sure there's anything to be gained by doing off+on... WDYT ? -- Vincent Legoll