From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vincent Legoll Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add python-pythondialog Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 12:52:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87lh1hcp18.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <20160704180530.GB13592@jasmine> <871t39jlzw.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <871t2fgvlk.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <87bn1ihzrf.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40831) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSiv6-0003pF-Di for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 06:52:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSiv5-000149-LE for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 06:52:04 -0400 Received: from mail-qk0-x243.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c09::243]:36039) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSiv5-000145-Hf for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 06:52:03 -0400 Received: by mail-qk0-x243.google.com with SMTP id q8so4592693qke.3 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 03:52:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87bn1ihzrf.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: ng0 Cc: guix-devel >> Is that what you want ? >> This is still untested though, but I'll try the 2 packages > > I don't understand. Is this completely untested or have you tested this > before sending the patch? This patch is untested. I didn't manage to test it (see the other thread: "guix package modif testing"). -- Vincent Legoll