From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 4BolK1w0sV6oTgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 05 May 2020 09:39:40 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id cBk1BWc0sV7jegAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 05 May 2020 09:39:51 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142::17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 246BB94006D for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 09:39:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:37196 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jVu3K-0004ar-LT for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 05 May 2020 05:39:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50450) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jVu2Q-0003bA-Mt for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2020 05:38:54 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-xd36.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::d36]:45747) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jVu2Q-00011B-0F; Tue, 05 May 2020 05:38:54 -0400 Received: by mail-io1-xd36.google.com with SMTP id i19so1230324ioh.12; Tue, 05 May 2020 02:38:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=intBEBCvhu8LML0g67uc39pmiaSzMIEZtuINzu5xEVw=; b=G0Cw3QNpM5s2SbAeFv8fvGTpqfaITppBS6Swt7sd/3VyZoDu4gyGjNlH4aQVk8e87n +xsYTS3EiG6ubJe8Swvgm5u+n12qTPdazs7nqU0GamyKmD2eSsWkccxQMaxpDoF+PrcX EnXuL75W1VahWDCgHYJRU94b+Mx07ClEEpU/lvrRI68xncoeJ6EgJ1dememNva9m9uvr sMSBRiotC0LhxLsgdxulglQJxmWyXl1rmDPc6ROcfOhwBZ5a2UjhBiQ76y6dIHl6IpFS 4l/l7Z3eB/ypYxmzZrWpB7XHHxV9nX/o6ekqnoId+bdH9dUcvb9sE9UVmYXVjYWrj19N h8Xw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=intBEBCvhu8LML0g67uc39pmiaSzMIEZtuINzu5xEVw=; b=pWo0bDxK0aCDCmweLnXBOQec45VdDzAuYNCHuLv+SOxWKaNnJQKlbL8bSUPZYlpvEj qUaWGdf6mSeP1KZrKt8CPMJkYUahjONT+yD0jwRtsDmCSNjSmO10ne6VpBshVUA0o5ub mlE0vkgetXLj6kJHQFWjNhF92kqI5rfB1svQTb6vsY78ieHBmMvsrY+/lserHrc4Ixdp ZWT5MF8WrRc1Z5JXyydxb25TmCO+79DUGvXOJXBGRGjmWt+00LBaiKzDZ7svrgtGiO/7 dR7B1ppaXxHrxTwpIBiPWVYfoqNyyx4dtit17auMygn5+GkwL11AIn9an9C1kKtENkNw HFQQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYv0/quAl/vgsIpEub14h9KBESPxmC1mfyIuvfQHCB/32dBzPGv CjtU2v2+t4KHSW9CcjK5Rl/gIrhPye46AMw6nyD8Zw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJbdpicZhhYznRHkD0E4xzfEGlopd+4kqRIkAte4WbI7fQi4u7EJGSsGdBRA3S1J2gkdwnvcsU5v7khtX8F/JU= X-Received: by 2002:a5e:8e4a:: with SMTP id r10mr2546281ioo.9.1588671531982; Tue, 05 May 2020 02:38:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200427101927.7020.76060@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20200427101947.E79D320A5E@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87o8r8lj9h.fsf@gnu.org> <87a72rr8jq.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhaovj3o.fsf@gnu.org> <87wo5spswe.fsf@gnu.org> <87wo5qn3be.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <87wo5qn3be.fsf@gnu.org> From: Vincent Legoll Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 11:38:40 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 18/36: services: hurd: Add dummy loopback. To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::d36; envelope-from=vincent.legoll@gmail.com; helo=mail-io1-xd36.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 X-Spam-Score: 1.59 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=G0Cw3QNp; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 2001:470:142::17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Scan-Result: default: False [1.59 / 13.00]; GENERIC_REPUTATION(0.00)[-0.49545423381651]; MX_INVALID(1.00)[cached]; DWL_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00)[2001:470:142::17:server fail]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2001:470:142::/48:c]; R_DKIM_REJECT(1.00)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; IP_REPUTATION_HAM(0.00)[asn: 22989(0.13), country: US(-0.00), ip: 2001:470:142::17(-0.50)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:-]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00)[2001:470:142::17:server fail]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:22989, ipnet:2001:470:142::/48, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[larch=yhetil.org]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[vincentlegoll@gmail.com,guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[gnu.org:email]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[gmail.com : SPF not aligned (relaxed),none] X-TUID: cgBeECgHhhY7 Hello, On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 11:23 AM Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > The patch below appears to fix it: Is target-word-size checking always equivalent to cross-compiling ? Aren't there cross-compilation host/target combos where this will be true, but still there will be other differences (endianness maybe) ? I don't know if the question really makes sense, though, so please forgive my ignorance... --=20 Vincent Legoll