From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vincent Legoll Subject: Re: Progress on the Hurd; new state of wip-hurd-vm Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:50:27 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87ftczttql.fsf@gnu.org> <93704715-88da-2d3b-fd51-d7bc99d6b346@gmail.com> <87d082sokr.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48586 helo=eggs1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQRCW-00029m-DP for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 03:50:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs1p.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQRCV-0002Jr-Dy for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 03:50:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87d082sokr.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Cc: guix-devel Hello, On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 7:39 AM Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Yes, some of them (gnutls, git, python) have just been cleaned-up and > applied to core-updates. nice ! > > I'm looking at the first one (for perl) for example... > > Ah, that one took some review and effort, see https://bugs.gnu.org/40698 > and has now been applied too. Oh, funny, I stumbled upon perl-cross, just after having sent my email. > > So, what's the status of those patches ? > > Hard to tell! Some of those are ready, others need review, others need > work. > > The autotools patches need review, but they work. The patches to > cross-build guix need some discussion and worse, cross-compiling guix > currently uses a terrible kludge; so while also that "works", its still > under development. Thanks a lot for your work ! And also for the status update. -- Vincent Legoll