From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vincent Legoll Subject: Re: Separate Mailing Lists for Patches vs General Dev Discussion? Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 13:56:36 +0200 Message-ID: References: <5796782D.1010104@gmx.net> <8760rsa88t.fsf@gnu.org> <8737muwxde.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38473) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bT6PC-0006JT-28 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 07:56:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bT6PA-0001Zz-8V for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 07:56:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8737muwxde.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel >> But resurrection & real use of patchwork (or any other consensus >> web tracker) would be a plus for at least some of us newcomers >> from different horizons. > > The instance at is > not widely used, it seems. > Part of the problem is that it often does not automatically detect whether > a patch has already been committed (requiring manual intervention) Been there done that, but only once, so I'm not burned by it, but I can imagine this being painful... There's not silver bullet for this -- Vincent Legoll