From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vincent Legoll Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] gnu: freedesktop: Add libinput-minimal. Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 13:25:31 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20160729082357.17501-1-david@craven.ch> <20160729082357.17501-4-david@craven.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33665) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bT5v5-0007lO-6Z for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 07:25:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bT5v2-0004v0-R3 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 07:25:34 -0400 Received: from mail-qt0-x242.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::242]:32976) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bT5v2-0004uw-MK for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 07:25:32 -0400 Received: by mail-qt0-x242.google.com with SMTP id j37so4513133qta.0 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 04:25:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160729082357.17501-4-david@craven.ch> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: David Craven Cc: guix-devel > @@ -97,8 +97,8 @@ freedesktop.org project.") > `(("libudev" ,eudev))) ; required by libinput.pc > (inputs > `(("libevdev" ,libevdev) > - ("mtdev" ,mtdev) > - ("libwacom" ,libwacom))) > + ("libwacom" ,libwacom) > + ("mtdev" ,mtdev))) > (home-page "https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/libinput/") > (synopsis "Input devices handling library") > (description Is this kind of reordering wanted ? I ask, because this is a major source of unneeded merge conflicts, for a dubious reason, IMHO. Or is there a real incentive to do that ? I know a lot of projects that would simply ask you to resend the patch without those modifications... Why not doing it scripted, all at once, a flag-day... -- Vincent Legoll