From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id AHXXDZsuOWB4KAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:23:39 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id AEi4CZsuOWBoYAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:23:39 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E408B17F54 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 18:23:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:54472 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFgpy-0007vB-3l for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 12:23:34 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40954) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFglR-00050u-LM for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 12:18:55 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::236]:41961) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFglK-00057w-7S for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 12:18:53 -0500 Received: by mail-lj1-x236.google.com with SMTP id q23so11435483lji.8 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 09:18:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fBImww0uppQWjeJR5ZVT5r9yic5C9UKSpUxnpYFUjoQ=; b=mz7Y6aVumc3tNesT3DPohjABVVpqJ/T9D1xIGOMlNEhw++OcYrhMCzBLEX2bxGQXym +WKIFYEySULes7DUjgHX2TyqrKY3vZQET0b078kBdlOgL6T4ljwZFQkv27c3urmD5f+S hjqZ701OCrQcQySVKDeXx2OFAxwF5o2Wyc77xP4GiAbnem4MTGDuMuZ3HPVT/qzn35eK ZO4sECPw8vnZxbL9PTa9RQJ8jwqZYNkOmfIuLig//L/obis8ZXryMKmitSV1zVB4f/9c kkFGFM6vRYFuSuZ7qk95feL4FbDrM9wJ49A9GiY0cHZKZ6nrHEzEy0DFrhrCpGn9oJIt fxVA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fBImww0uppQWjeJR5ZVT5r9yic5C9UKSpUxnpYFUjoQ=; b=KZmd3HsQAx0XcLINkeB3AoOkMyQga5tcvxzo7LxHdYQyVJvaXDGlcj5bVowRgaToqv O9gGzFK1rDjBYs5sxjCglz/DzgrPaXZsACGrNMY5JP/r8oGddhKx+ptzPTEzU1UK1kp6 HSOmgg7vHn9+UHXH2yiPOK26nVIPYJe9bv0csEXKdn6bnEWd71bWzP+BrcFRms5ZBftA A9Ov02MhWu7M1gaQhVsoXKEY6tkNkwhNewQluJfbXE83szicvH4b7L7igqMomIeCBwrS PwZZIwLXuqWEhBSQz3c7KMF9h6I+/DW3mENy3a+okuHE+StkHSwLw2ANmDk/vcFDnXPk HehQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532cF8xwvTmRUsTU3TxsnuAzaEIY8F3fGaabXpnjxYvwYbdYItK/ 2vir18WrVT4KKe4IostB1QhnBB6AVbs4JnnBDWMpZTmW X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzXXWuzNSMI6VR40QKPw1TtBpOJhLhnjz26xMv/4eNHuw47JAEO3GbSVLcfDweOWxnT6remMu1sl9m0RRbG1Yg= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b8cc:: with SMTP id s12mr2205735ljp.221.1614359921057; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 09:18:41 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Vincent Legoll Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 18:18:29 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Xpdf with or without Qt To: Andreas Enge Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::236; envelope-from=vincent.legoll@gmail.com; helo=mail-lj1-x236.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1614360215; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=fBImww0uppQWjeJR5ZVT5r9yic5C9UKSpUxnpYFUjoQ=; b=kMl+MDC1VN0zkmfOhHmb+YyHjgZbHdXtanle1us3g7Xl9DM/XTk1E+Kap4EnjP4fwHdHKJ 2yyKg3p0JbWkvSVStrH2MVzkLOpSKlH6w7y77GB4zGKNQd7RS8kJqMv6jqy4I4a64n//5t AywSitgpOOKIBqpnwRS7RDzDX9CVlr+YmlXTmAeld0zLpG1plb6mEKKReSfJkc7igRpnse GMbmqkxIVI/IY2gi9XwXS49JiLKQbDB2U/ovMj2lyK3dsTERVFBsEW7t05ZMOWJSqMft9s WLRQofLyqlG40QD8l+S95Ptxn9XyhWd1CPH1hj4QU33LpKUJF2OA1q6HBj2knQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1614360215; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=r4Bj9pz0TyTg9FLrFGCiayB09BnbwQWv0qhOAym8kldv9GNmpPIVlWgqSvzs5Xi85KdmPe 7MD156nq4XF/xl9iPxOF1rQsGEOtrIeRiFJDpN7TOZFy0ZDQYuBKkS3Y8xgu0AUaj3wI8z q6UAV/EVYLAslCzA2frxthaYxJkJldVR4vd6x2t6OA86YbkVsp1nqJMKuZ0IwxJXWwzFLm iNuK6kx3AKl0nP0uK5OCpgvvrvd/OBOld+6kFS8u7jfmoEJ4gCP3+M+mnmzp3XrQUNqAha 8KMP23fYBhSVboXkzM4sVa8zzdlLi/R6gqsfW6TCp4Jhak/GQgBucDrIQky/fQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=mz7Y6aVu; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.07 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=mz7Y6aVu; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: E408B17F54 X-Spam-Score: -3.07 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: AuVwKz73b3sx In retrospect, I should probably have added a note in the commit message that it would be a somewhat major change. With an emphasis on the X -> QT migration. On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 6:02 PM Andreas Enge wrote: > How can I personally keep the old variant? > Should I create a custom channel with xpdf@4.02? Or even xpdf@5 to have > a higher version number, but with the old 4.02 package code and source? > Or a manifest including some time-machine thing, or a personal package > transformation that compiles xpdf --with-source=...? I don't really know the answer to this, but if you're copying the old code, just name your "pinned" package "xpdf-4.02" so that it's not recognized as "xpdf", and that should protect you from xpdf upgrades. -- Vincent Legoll