From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor_Boskovits?= Subject: Re: Fixing ant-bootstrap / jamvm segfault (i686) Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 09:41:20 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87v9tsped0.fsf@elephly.net> <87blv6gqjt.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002ab59d059384041a" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38059) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iDksn-0007sE-Cz for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 03:41:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iDksm-0004V5-A7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 03:41:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87blv6gqjt.fsf@elephly.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: Guix-devel , julien lepiller --0000000000002ab59d059384041a Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ricardo Wurmus ezt =C3=ADrta (id=C5=91pont: 2019. szep= t. 27., P=C3=A9n 9:14): > > Hi G=C3=A1bor, > > > Ricardo Wurmus ezt =C3=ADrta (id=C5=91pont: 2019. = szept. 16., > > H=C3=A9t 15:20): > > > >> Hi Guix, > >> > >> here=E2=80=99s a probably needlessly complicated patch to fix the buil= d of > >> ant-bootstrap. It currently fails to build because jamvm > >> segfaults. > > [=E2=80=A6] > > >> I=E2=80=99m almost certain that not all of these configure flags are n= eeded. > >> What do you think? Would someone like to play a little with this patc= h > >> and see if we can figure out why exactly jamvm segfaults? > >> > > I will try to have a look at this again in the coming days. > > > >> > >> I used this command to build ant-bootstrap: > >> > >> ./pre-inst-env guix build -K --system=3Di686-linux -e '(@@ (gnu > packages > >> java) ant-bootstrap)' > > Have you been able to take a look at this? I=E2=80=99d like to push this= or a > variant > of it to the core-updates branch soon. > Not yet. I will have a look tomorrow and report back if that is not too late. > > -- > Ricardo > > --0000000000002ab59d059384041a Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> ezt =C3=ADrta (id=C5=91pont: 2019. szept. 27.= , P=C3=A9n 9:14):

Hi G=C3=A1bor,

> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> ezt =C3=ADrta (id=C5=91p= ont: 2019. szept. 16.,
> H=C3=A9t 15:20):
>
>> Hi Guix,
>>
>> here=E2=80=99s a probably needlessly complicated patch to fix the = build of
>> ant-bootstrap.=C2=A0 It currently fails to build because jamvm
>> segfaults.

[=E2=80=A6]

>> I=E2=80=99m almost certain that not all of these configure flags a= re needed.
>> What do you think?=C2=A0 Would someone like to play a little with = this patch
>> and see if we can figure out why exactly jamvm segfaults?
>>
> I will try to have a look at this again in the coming days.
>
>>
>> I used this command to build ant-bootstrap:
>>
>>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0./pre-inst-env guix build -K --system=3Di686-li= nux -e '(@@ (gnu packages
>> java) ant-bootstrap)'

Have you been able to take a look at this?=C2=A0 I=E2=80=99d like to push t= his or a variant
of it to the core-updates branch soon.
Not yet. I will have a look tomorrow and report back if that is n= ot too late.

--
Ricardo

--0000000000002ab59d059384041a--