From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor_Boskovits?= <boskovits@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Making javadoc reproducible
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 19:35:51 +0200
Message-ID: <CAE4v=pi5fbxcryAd3aUpXEUox1O_PBKfs9mkvP-uUr2WQ6-M8w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAE4v=phFRSq98fJGz4b0mVvSUTfnuOVO+tUwqNGGKxHfMDTtVg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41430)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <boskovits@gmail.com>) id 1gB1M6-0005GZ-Hn
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2018 13:36:07 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <boskovits@gmail.com>) id 1gB1M5-0003uk-Sb
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2018 13:36:06 -0400
Received: from mail-io1-xd2f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2f]:38426)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <boskovits@gmail.com>) id 1gB1M5-0003uK-Lz
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2018 13:36:05 -0400
Received: by mail-io1-xd2f.google.com with SMTP id n5-v6so9797623ioh.5
	for <guix-devel@gnu.org>; Fri, 12 Oct 2018 10:36:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAE4v=phFRSq98fJGz4b0mVvSUTfnuOVO+tUwqNGGKxHfMDTtVg@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

G=C3=A1bor Boskovits <boskovits@gmail.com> ezt =C3=ADrta (id=C5=91pont: 201=
8. okt.
12., P, 19:00):
>
> Hello guix,
>
> I've tracked down the javadoc timestamp problem.
> There is a command line flag for javadoc (notimestamp), that disables
> generating the comment in the docs that contains the timestamp.
> Currently I see two ways forward:
> 1. Track down the calls to javadoc, and add the flag to all calls.
> 2. Write a simple patch to make javadoc behave as if notimestamp was
> specified, whenever
> SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is defined.
> I do not think, that the patch produced by 2 is upstreamable, but it
> seems much less work. WDYT?

Also we can simply turn off the timestamp generation unconditionally...