From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor_Boskovits?= Subject: Re: GSoC: Adding a web interface similar to the Hydra web interface Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 16:22:36 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87o9hog2ye.fsf@elephly.net> <87d0xyn9zs.fsf@elephly.net> <87d0xswvls.fsf@elephly.net> <87r2m4ntk4.fsf@mdc-berlin.de> <87tvqxy4i9.fsf@elephly.net> <87in78hxo2.fsf@elephly.net> <878t7xb58o.fsf@elephly.net> <874lijbqvf.fsf@elephly.net> <20180606200210.7a9c4dd6@scratchpost.org> <20180612183504.2621cefa@scratchpost.org> <8736xrd64y.fsf@elephly.net> <87bmcebxfx.fsf@fastmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009c42d8056e86b752" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45662) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fT6fi-0003zP-GG for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 10:22:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fT6fh-0003Lf-GQ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 10:22:50 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-x233.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c06::233]:46288) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fT6fh-0003KW-BL for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 10:22:49 -0400 Received: by mail-io0-x233.google.com with SMTP id d22-v6so3597105iof.13 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 07:22:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87bmcebxfx.fsf@fastmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Joshua Branson Cc: Guix-devel --0000000000009c42d8056e86b752 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Joshua Branson ezt =C3=ADrta (id=C5=91pont: 2018. j= =C3=BAn. 13., Sze 15:52): > Tatiana Sholokhova writes: > > > Hello, > > > > Thank you for your reviews! > > > > I've just fixed codestyle issues and replaced HTML5 preamble with XHTML= . > > Just cause I'm curious, why XHTML instead HTML5? Is XHTML better to pars= e? > (This question comes from non guix developer by the way. Just an > enthusiast). > > > > > > > Thanks again for your excellent work! > > > > -- > > Ricardo > Joshua, both formats have advantages, and also disadvantages. I think this issue deserves its own discussion. It would be nice to collect the opinions, but I think that currently we have a good quality and well integrated xml generator, and we do not have a html5 generator. Please correct me if I am wrong. > --0000000000009c42d8056e86b752 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


= Joshua Branson <jbranso@fastmail.com> ezt =C3=ADrta = (id=C5=91pont: 2018. j=C3=BAn. 13., Sze 15:52):
Tatiana Sholokhova <tanja201396@g= mail.com> writes:

> Hello,
>
> Thank you for your reviews!
>
> I've just fixed codestyle issues and replaced HTML5 preamble with = XHTML.

Just cause I'm curious, why XHTML instead HTML5?=C2=A0 Is XHTML better = to parse?
(This question comes from non guix developer by the way.=C2=A0 Just an enth= usiast).

>
>
>=C2=A0 Thanks again for your excellent work!
>
>=C2=A0 --
>=C2=A0 Ricardo
Joshua, bo= th formats have advantages, and also disadvantages. I think this issue dese= rves its own discussion. It would be nice to collect the opinions, but I th= ink that currently we have a good quality and well integrated xml generator= , and we do not have a html5 generator. Please correct me if I am wrong.
--0000000000009c42d8056e86b752--