From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor_Boskovits?= Subject: diffoscope Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2018 18:44:02 +0100 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113f8c2a3f4d5c0562abedfd" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53557) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eaPqe-0001GV-U9 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jan 2018 12:44:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eaPqe-0001Lz-8C for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jan 2018 12:44:04 -0500 Received: from mail-io0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c06::235]:36575) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eaPqe-0001Lq-22 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jan 2018 12:44:04 -0500 Received: by mail-io0-x235.google.com with SMTP id i143so9116386ioa.3 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2018 09:44:03 -0800 (PST) List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Guix-devel --001a113f8c2a3f4d5c0562abedfd Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hello guix, I think we should consider moving some diffoscope inputs to propagated inputs. It would be nice to test it with a plain profile, to check what should be propagated. I don't know if package-management is a logical place for this package. Do we have any better to place this? --001a113f8c2a3f4d5c0562abedfd Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello guix,

I think we should consider = moving some diffoscope inputs to propagated inputs.
It would be n= ice to test it with a plain profile, to check what should be propagated.

I don't know if package-management is a logical = place for this package.
Do we have any better to place this?

--001a113f8c2a3f4d5c0562abedfd--