From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor_Boskovits?= Subject: Re: Video license Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 07:33:46 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20190606003632.754deed6@alma-ubu> <6f9d51098d1862dffe86ccdfd522c9d6c394e3bc.camel@tourbillion-technology.com> <20190612002530.39e65783@alma-ubu> <20190614114422.522628aa@alma-ubu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000427c4f058b57c9ed" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43062) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hc3H9-0003Ux-JU for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 03:39:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hc3CN-0005G1-9J for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 03:34:04 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x531.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::531]:33801) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hc3CM-0005Cj-05 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 03:34:03 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-x531.google.com with SMTP id s49so7047918edb.1 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 00:33:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20190614114422.522628aa@alma-ubu> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIEjDtmZsaW5n?= Cc: guix-devel , Ricardo Wurmus , Paul Garlick --000000000000427c4f058b57c9ed Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, Bj=C3=B6rn H=C3=B6fling ezt =C3=ADrta (= id=C5=91pont: 2019. j=C3=BAn. 14., P, 9:44): > Hi G=C3=A1bor, > > On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 09:12:14 +0200 > G=C3=A1bor Boskovits wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > iirc this license discussion came about earlier, please have a look > > at that also. > > There were some problems regarding license compatibility. Otherwise I > > ageree. > > I can't find the older discussions. Which are the problems regarding > license compatibility you see here? > > Unfortunately I can't find it either, but I remember that this discussed. Sorry about not being able to come up with more details. The two things that came up was: 1. the manual is under GNU FDL, but as long as the videos are not considere= d deriving from the manual, this should not be a problem. 2. can the videos have a separate license from the code that they are critically dependent on? - believe yes. So all in all, I believe that the license choices you made make sense, and iirc I proposed exactly the same set of licenses on that older thread, which I will try to find. It is well possible that it was discussed on irc. I would like to see this fixed soon, the idea of having source code in > Guix' repositories that is only open-sourced but not free software > annoys me. > > Bj=C3=B6rn > Yes, I agree, it would be great to fix this soon. Best regards, g_bor --=20 OpenPGP Key Fingerprint: 7988:3B9F:7D6A:4DBF:3719:0367:2506:A96C:CF63:0B21 --000000000000427c4f058b57c9ed Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,

Bj=C3=B6rn H=C3=B6fling <bjoern.hoefling@bjoernhoefling.de= > ezt =C3=ADrta (id=C5=91pont: 2019. j=C3=BAn. 14., P, 9:44):
<= blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-l= eft:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hi G=C3=A1bor,

On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 09:12:14 +0200
G=C3=A1bor Boskovits <boskovits@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> iirc this license discussion came about earlier, please have a look > at that also.
> There were some problems regarding license compatibility. Otherwise I<= br> > ageree.

I can't find the older discussions. Which are the problems regarding license compatibility you see here?


Unfortunately I can't find it eith= er, but I remember that this discussed. Sorry
about not being abl= e to come up with more details.

The two things= that came up was:
1. the manual is under GNU FDL, but as long as= the videos are not considered
deriving from the manual, this sho= uld not be a problem.
2. can the videos have a separate license f= rom the code that they are critically
dependent on? - believe yes= .
=C2=A0
So all in all, I believe that the license = choices you made make sense, and iirc
I proposed exactly the same= set of licenses on that older thread, which I will
try to find. = It is well possible that it was discussed on irc.

<= blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-l= eft:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> I would like to see this fixed soon, the idea of having source code in
Guix' repositories that is only open-sourced but not free software
annoys me.

Bj=C3=B6rn

Yes, I agree, it would be gr= eat to fix this soon.

Best regards,
g_bo= r

--
OpenPGP Key Fingerprint: 7988:3B9F:7D6A:4DBF:3719:0367:2506:A9= 6C:CF63:0B21
--000000000000427c4f058b57c9ed--