unofficial mirror of guix-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Gábor Boskovits" <boskovits@gmail.com>
To: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: Guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Should we upgrade openssl?
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 08:09:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAE4v=pghbrKCp5Pdw7iJuT5FvWsdLRmuCEhCSOGNNvw5TtovxA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r2a1d7s3.fsf@gnu.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1605 bytes --]

Hello,

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> ezt írta (időpont: 2019. ápr. 16., K 22:17):

> Hello!
>
> Christopher Lemmer Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org> skribis:
>
> > From the openssl website:
> >
> >> Note: The latest stable version is the 1.1.1 series. This is also our
> >> Long Term Support (LTS) version, supported until 11th September
> >> 2023. Our previous LTS version (1.0.2 series) will continue to be
> >> supported until 31st December 2019 (security fixes only during the
> >> last year of support). The 1.1.0 series is currently only receiving
> >> security fixes and will go out of support on 11th September 2019. All
> >> users of 1.0.2 and 1.1.0 are encouraged to upgrade to 1.1.1 as soon as
> >> possible. The 0.9.8, 1.0.0 and 1.0.1 versions are now out of support
> >> and should not be used.
> >
> > I know, everyone's going to groan hearing this, but maybe given the
> > above it would make sense to upgrade to the openssl 1.1.0 series before
> > Guix 1.0 gets out the door?
>
> Indeed, I was under the assumption that 1.0 was still the stable
> version, but apparently it’s not.
>
> What do Leo and others think?
>

I would go for the upgrade. As this is a change affecting lots of packages,
and this upgrade would allow us to reduce the chances to stuck with a
vulnerable version. I also suppose, that there areg- some changes on
core-updates we would like to merge anyways before 1.0, so if the upgrade
goes smoothly, then this is not a big loss of time. Wdyt?

>
> Thanks for the heads-up!
>
> Ludo’.
>

Best regards,
g_bor

>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2521 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-17  6:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-15 14:10 Should we upgrade openssl? Christopher Lemmer Webber
2019-04-16 20:17 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-04-17  6:09   ` Gábor Boskovits [this message]
2019-04-17 12:28     ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-04-17 12:31       ` Gábor Boskovits
2019-04-18 17:15         ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-04-19 16:56       ` Leo Famulari

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAE4v=pghbrKCp5Pdw7iJuT5FvWsdLRmuCEhCSOGNNvw5TtovxA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=boskovits@gmail.com \
    --cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=ludo@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).