From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor_Boskovits?= Subject: Re: Status update on 1.0 Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 20:20:32 +0100 Message-ID: References: <871s3a4xd4.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhpw2ql4.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40570) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h4scA-0005ae-GL for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 15:35:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h4sNt-0003sh-Pz for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 15:20:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: "Thompson, David" Cc: Guix-devel Hello, Thompson, David ezt =C3=ADrta (id=C5=91pont: 201= 9. m=C3=A1rc. 15., P, 19:32): > > Quick tangent: My memory is a bit fuzzy, but I think that netlink API > wrappers would put us one step closer to being able to implement > useful network isolation in our container implementation (right now > you only have loopback, not so fun), like what Docker can do. Just > something to consider. :) > > - Dave > Yes, that is correct. This is exactly one of the reasons I considered this. Best regards, g_bor