Re: Clarifying blog post licensing

["Gábor Boskovits" <gboskovits@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1084 bytes --]

I agree.

pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) <pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de> ezt írta (időpont:
2022. jan. 27., Cs 18:35):

> I agree.
>
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10:24:11AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > Hello Guix!
> >
> > With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is
> > not great as it prevents sharing and reuse, at least by those outside
> > Guix circles (we discussed it in the past but never got around to fixing
> > it).
> >
> > I’d like us to clarify that, with a footer on blog posts saying that,
> > unless otherwise stated, posts are dual-licensed under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and
> > GFDL 1.3+ (the latter so we can reuse material in the cookbook and in
> > the manual).  Patch below.
> >
> > What do people think?
> >
> > If maintainers and everyone agrees, I’d like to publicly email all the
> > authors asking them whether they agree with the proposed licensing
> > terms, or whether they’d like a different free license.  The script
> > below enumerates blog post authors (the list needs a bit of cleanup
> > still):
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1455 bytes --]