From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: End of beta soon? drop i686? Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 12:52:32 -0500 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47167) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gXVbq-0001gu-4A for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 13:21:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gXVbk-0006GK-Kt for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 13:21:18 -0500 Received: from mailhub2.soe.uq.edu.au ([130.102.132.209]:55645 helo=newmailhub.uq.edu.au) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gXVbi-00069U-PZ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 13:21:12 -0500 Received: from smtp1.soe.uq.edu.au (smtp1.soe.uq.edu.au [10.138.113.40]) by newmailhub.uq.edu.au (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id wBDIKxSF032096 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 04:20:59 +1000 Received: from studenthub.uq.edu.au (ca-careerhubweb.aa-prod.aws.uq.edu.au [10.209.85.182]) by smtp1.soe.uq.edu.au (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id wBDIBVLJ031883 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA256 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 04:11:31 +1000 List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Danny Milosavljevic Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi Danny, Danny Milosavljevic writes: >> Note that we also lost 'icecat' on armhf-linux with the 52->60 upgrade, >> because our 'rust' packages have never worked on armhf-linux. > > Wait, what? I wasn't aware. Let's track this as a bug - that's > definitely not supposed to happen. > > mrustc works on armhf - I tested it on physical armhf hardware before merging. > > So one of the other Rusts doesn't work? I'll check out Hydra logs... > > https://hydra.gnu.org/build/3215481/nixlog/1/raw indicates a timeout of > silence - we might want to increase it. (this particular step takes many > many MANY minutes on x86_64, too). > > Would that be the "(properties '((timeout . 3600)))))" thing? Or is a > "timeout of silence" an extra setting? I see that you increased the timeouts for rust-1.19.0, and I asked Hydra to retry the build. It failed again, in a different way: https://hydra.gnu.org/build/3215481/nixlog/2/raw Mark