From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS
	id oN//KivAdGUovwAAG6o9tA:P1
	(envelope-from <guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Sat, 09 Dec 2023 20:29:47 +0100
Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS
	id oN//KivAdGUovwAAG6o9tA
	(envelope-from <guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Sat, 09 Dec 2023 20:29:47 +0100
X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org
Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com;
	dkim=pass header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail3 header.b=cP+ryERg;
	spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org";
	dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=protonmail.com
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org;
	s=key1; t=1702150187;
	h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:
	 message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:
	 content-type:content-type:
	 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help:
	 list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature;
	bh=5biN6Ajh/uMeUKMe7+WxGMKKPdUmfo0mMjyaWpSGfVc=;
	b=aPg27CUEMkusxhpMvRJ6U/VbXoKwAadtakrEvBYiydymub5Ylzs7HYWiqXOGoGG+pUdVfn
	FQkafyF5UHwBAvn6TQEpC5D0geYkNhD4QscFvz1aCAyxD4dl0fp2aiumeyfLMvdm4cp8V+
	FZzDq7Z4N+LpfZ/dscxF0H61c5a7d5goXdopU6gB63LHpjxpVnGNbjxUKgSyjuVYDO3X7O
	JSJFojvArCLareqdYms2d5vbNxfqJ3sKEhRGpBPZs+i56x79blZKBMV+L6tubl5mbryM5y
	Y0OH47KrWfon109MduihyrMlvCNwdhyjWoPS+CmUvbVLm32mzSt7XLiDjxruQQ==
ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1702150187; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none;
	b=OsTHNbEonRUfpgp3nXqGjm5UXP5c/MQ4kU9ZnhweN/IdwfHRQu5kWhf0q2w2DQEjbb8gme
	3PoBJuluyHKmo/d0AUyiOUb9f/MRhoiCtiGNQgWCit0n7UacsrVBMwJpQ0ol7WLFuxzJXE
	wOA5RTKYCtQzjIiJrZLH3Z/0n7chut5UVKfTqkFAiCG18UtV63A1/fyHWUqJrvgMAQH7U6
	zZ5yTV2cohDw1sSho7KWlLy3BWsuK+Vhrb51hEjarm2MSStwqOuWqjGHN9i6xEegkz0/k2
	T4vvCMhoo86tMNyUOIR2ISgX/5BYqaQ5IwBVUwyHtPlNLYTpwAAu1r0aEPhR6A==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1;
	aspmx1.migadu.com;
	dkim=pass header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail3 header.b=cP+ryERg;
	spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org";
	dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=protonmail.com
Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B68222D53
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Sat,  9 Dec 2023 20:29:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org>)
	id 1rC30g-0001Ap-BC; Sat, 09 Dec 2023 14:29:10 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <kaelyn.alexi@protonmail.com>)
 id 1rC30e-0001AO-IY
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2023 14:29:08 -0500
Received: from mail-40131.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.131])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <kaelyn.alexi@protonmail.com>)
 id 1rC30b-0006pO-Vv
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2023 14:29:08 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com;
 s=protonmail3; t=1702150141; x=1702409341;
 bh=5biN6Ajh/uMeUKMe7+WxGMKKPdUmfo0mMjyaWpSGfVc=;
 h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:
 Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:
 Message-ID:BIMI-Selector;
 b=cP+ryERg1uq57wf4YvYnrw8YAdq0Kur3ihvq/TADpOz2lLZU9Yrlxoh2lAZrn0TtR
 fRe74q9cqU52x7bI+yAONhVjiKu0Q3AFe/2vLYd6lNlpDaDDUHm/TZEG4QUWt/wVQB
 UxQAFqyGIwDGuL5zBK+V4A5L55tl9l0PCikA+yOavgSlmV5UprGjIw6T5z/GHx9w4n
 pOJ4NaIdNWTltiXNgnOSoSuKwdsKbRJ+fKJXpKyrMoXTI4MiE5UCdWWMh9goQOGGkl
 7r34VV5HLTdz0FUa/PFefFNLsjgIY1ZFx7AzH5VErfij1Q5qy4v91Zb9pntyjfGXma
 G7aC0xOGGitvA==
Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2023 19:28:46 +0000
To: Kaelyn <kaelyn.alexi@protonmail.com>
From: Kaelyn <kaelyn.alexi@protonmail.com>
Cc: John Kehayias <john.kehayias@protonmail.com>, guix-devel@gnu.org,
 "66964@debbugs.gnu.org" <66964@debbugs.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#66964: Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch
Message-ID: <BHpzRQHJypx3wH0EYnyZTz4bhzimiXCUrKYiusTC8NG_aIUCg24L9CchkJgWusBFVwE1h83k6lpqSEMVJdXW_NqyMxxB1yP6SLcIZLpPsA8=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7k1WKdjeNkQdy2Sn-n5KIRtaueKF5rV_eePjWm6w9cp5wSdgaTiv-siJxwNeX12FUywY_ezumz-LeYDMKR_bBbdFn2YrD-e3-IvyvneN15E=@protonmail.com>
References: <878r7b32qm.fsf@protonmail.com>
 <m-1_kiiKXWXP4nJVxxUfx4CaLLLo-pNr7J3C4dKk0erStH8DfkrwqyQ3s1ou2ibM1cul7813G5q5znMvotRhWsVHSgkTVJqrSRO3jSgyM5w=@protonmail.com>
 <87y1f0t7s9.fsf_-_@protonmail.com>
 <7k1WKdjeNkQdy2Sn-n5KIRtaueKF5rV_eePjWm6w9cp5wSdgaTiv-siJxwNeX12FUywY_ezumz-LeYDMKR_bBbdFn2YrD-e3-IvyvneN15E=@protonmail.com>
Feedback-ID: 34709329:user:proton
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.40.131;
 envelope-from=kaelyn.alexi@protonmail.com; helo=mail-40131.protonmail.ch
X-Spam_score_int: -8
X-Spam_score: -0.9
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: (-0.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001, TO_EQ_FM_DIRECT_MX=1.256,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org
X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN
X-Migadu-Country: US
X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -9.57
X-Spam-Score: -9.57
X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 9B68222D53
X-Migadu-Scanner: mx12.migadu.com
X-TUID: AMBbyFBXt6xL

Hi,

On Tuesday, November 14th, 2023 at 12:36 PM, Kaelyn <kaelyn.alexi@protonmai=
l.com> wrote:

>=20
> Hi John,
>=20
> On Tuesday, November 14th, 2023 at 12:11 PM, John Kehayias john.kehayias@=
protonmail.com wrote:
>=20
> > Hi Kaelyn,
> >=20
> > On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 08:01 PM, Kaelyn wrote:
> >=20
> > > Hi,
> > >=20
> > > I've just submitted a pair of patches for the mesa-updates branch:
> > > https://issues.guix.gnu.org/67136 updating xorgproto and
> > > xorg-server-xwayland. The xorgproto is a high-impact update (guix
> > > refresh reports rebuilding 8710 packages would ensure 22871 dependent
> > > packages are rebuilt), but required to update to the latest xwayland
> > > as xwayland requires a newer version of presentproto than in the
> > > current guix xorgproto package. The updating and ungrafting of mesa
> > > and a number of X.org related libraries seemed like a good time (and
> > > place) to update xorgproto as well.
> > >=20
> > > Cheers,
> > > Kaelyn
> >=20
> > Thanks for the patches. I think mesa-updates in this current iteration
> > is set on builds (ended up being a lot more due to the ungrafting but
> > seems done on our main architectures for several days now). I had to
> > make some other changes to fix some larger breakages but at this point =
I
> > think it will just be taking us back in the build queue too much.
> >=20
> > So I think it would make more sense on the next big rebuild, either
> > core-updates (talk about doing that with more ungrafts right now) or
> > I'll do mesa-updates again when the next release of mesa hits. Or maybe
> > it makes sense to just do another branch for xwayland?
> >=20
> > Open to ideas! I'll send a separate message soon on the status of
> > mesa-updates and see what people think, but my thought was to merge thi=
s
> > to master in the next day or so if there are no objections.
> >=20
> > Thanks!
> > John
>=20
>=20
> No worries! I realize I was a little late to the party for the mesa-updat=
es branch (had some ongoing technical issues), so if core-updates is still =
early enough in the process I think it would be good to push the changes to=
 that branch. The current xwayland is pretty old, and the updated version h=
as quite a few CVEs fixed in comparison (just https://www.phoronix.com/news=
/X.Org-Halloween-Bugs-2023 and https://www.phoronix.com/news/X.Org-Server-H=
oliday-2022 list 8 CVEs fixed between xwayland 21.1.3 and 23.2.2).

I forgot to sent an email when I did this, but a few weeks ago I updated th=
e xorgproto/xwayland update ticket (#66964) to refer to core-updates instea=
d of mesa-updates and sent in a v2 of the patches rebased against core-upda=
tes.

Cheers,
Kaelyn