From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id QOjCCyB8kF+dRwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 18:21:20 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id OLcsByB8kF9fWQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 18:21:20 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E415B9404C6 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 18:21:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:42100 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kVIje-0004Ta-Tn for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 14:21:18 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59220) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kVISz-00013h-ND for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 14:04:07 -0400 Received: from lepiller.eu ([2a00:5884:8208::1]:35422) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kVISw-0001lC-Br; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 14:04:05 -0400 Received: from lepiller.eu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id aa3dba20; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 18:03:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=lepiller.eu; h=date :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:subject:to:cc:from:message-id; s= dkim; bh=ZWBESw2tbDQvKlsjPDf1rCOA+Vs6fz/K8WxhwsHJmko=; b=fmGRkxT V/vKfLaU7BUex6BRRtzvhRwx9C5vxeL5s+f5PNocDB//Elj6rl3k4e48e1gI7wi4 sABEKktBt3VcEp8rRhqz/9EbUmjwWfEh665kjkhJyt4hnkX/VOEGSAeniExW3g4a p0ue6y6o/3vNMf8ygQoPHBn+LCjN4rNRBN5vwi1vLcwEWd8UzB6rSSGLbAPtlUqa syhdKX9s14N4ixJbfPPhZQY3E9OxZEzJGWTcl7g7h+jN85VmBJNpvJ6amacgeSW9 7JQWT0ZtyazNtp96o7Uay44a53fTKQLokhvZcSXaPd2wJx6IPsJwr5URyR6xMvZZ pjvjGbgnK2/RU1Q== Received: by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 25c5c913 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Wed, 21 Oct 2020 18:03:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 14:03:41 -0400 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <87wnzj1shv.fsf@gnu.org> References: <863630u6ap.fsf@gmail.com> <87zh4f4ukl.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnzj1shv.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Update on the timeline for the release v1.2. To: guix-devel@gnu.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ludovic_Court=E8s?= , zimoun From: Julien Lepiller Message-ID: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:5884:8208::1; envelope-from=julien@lepiller.eu; helo=lepiller.eu X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Jakub_K=C4=85dzio=C5=82ka?= , Guix Devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=lepiller.eu header.s=dkim header.b=fmGRkxT ; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=lepiller.eu (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.59 X-TUID: 9gOZGOxaSxeA Le 21 octobre 2020 11:57:48 GMT-04:00, "Ludovic Court=C3=A8s" a =C3=A9crit : >zimoun skribis: > >>> > The proposed coming timeline is: >>> > >>> > - freeze starting the Oct=2E 26th >>> > - last round for testing all over the week >>> > - unfreeze the Oct=2E 29th and then create the branch >>> > - minor bug fixes and all the papeword around (NEWS, blog, etc=2E) >>> > - release Nov=2E 6th=2E >>> >>> Overall LGTM, but could you clarify what you mean by =E2=80=9Cfreeze= =E2=80=9D on >>> Oct=2E 26=E2=80=9329? No =E2=80=9Cimportant=E2=80=9D changes to =E2= =80=98master=E2=80=99, including to the >>> manual, is that correct? >> >> Yes, no "important" changes to 'master' which means: >> - no package or service updates > >I would phrase it as no _important_ package or service updates=2E >Updating non-critical leaf packages or services is probably fine=2E > >> - no manual entry >> - only serious fixes under guix/ or installer(s) >> >> From my point of view, it is easier to freeze 'master' since >everybody >> can "guix pull" and check that everything is fine=2E >> Otherwise, instead of the freeze, let create the branch and so "guix >> pull --branch=3Dversion-1=2E2=2E0"=2E It is up to you=2E > >Yeah we could also branch on the 26th and cherry-pick harmless changes >from =E2=80=98master=E2=80=99, so people can still have fun on =E2=80=98m= aster=E2=80=99=2E > >Mathieu, Marius, Maxim, Tobias: thoughts? Wouldn't that mess up with guix's authentication mechanism? If we branch v= 1=2E2 early, our release will have no forward path to master, so all our us= ers will get an error when running guix pull=2E > >Ludo=E2=80=99=2E