From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id WGkiDaDleWEzUwEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 01:49:52 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id oB/xCKDleWH6LQAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 23:49:52 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96A09120EB for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 01:49:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:56124 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mfsg2-0006cE-MY for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 19:49:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34710) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mfsfD-0006b0-IT for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 19:48:59 -0400 Received: from mx1.dismail.de ([78.46.223.134]:3257) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mfsfB-0008U6-7v; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 19:48:59 -0400 Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 38e7fb3d; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 01:48:55 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h= mime-version:date:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from :message-id:subject:to:cc:in-reply-to:references; s=20190914; bh=yuIKUHx1S+23v9Mh5tGJMQ+5NEEIJP4AULk/eoa64D4=; b=COPQreFzoUJK gMF1N8Jg6QZz7xC9Q0gSnTFjfjzQi/5Yfl/ygI9hYxUDTo6o/WwqLqaXKx08a7S+ n0tqGLL/ehuraCLF571dC1LrNfFwQ5/ED0IdJVy0AkEZWEEFlQp7TpZIbsdPF3A0 9YDa5C5BtiS/NqHH6oS+3yks9Z7YpNWiIDsdScgfv5NcHbjIPcYfCDiAWhtDIdMW /vn6ufFMhpPKTPEWPEe+ggXmAjAxTs2qPDm1A/GABxNhd+GQsjS7AUQGIMLzN57X 52u9r3naciU5sv1CS6My83rYqCbxjMw5MdbUZOXXggfpBBP7kE6rQj8SVzAZerOf 68XOXePXhg== Received: from smtp1.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.11]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 4d7aa02b; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 01:48:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id f289d6c2; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 01:48:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 36cc8ae1 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Thu, 28 Oct 2021 01:48:51 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 23:48:53 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: RainLoop/1.14.0a From: jbranso@dismail.de Message-ID: <9e7b2e197720a843fcca984e2380b81e@dismail.de> Subject: Re: Time for a request-for-comments process? To: "Katherine Cox-Buday" , "=?utf-8?B?THVkb3ZpYyBDb3VydMOocw==?=" Cc: "Guix Devel" In-Reply-To: <87zgqu9k75.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87zgqu9k75.fsf@gmail.com> <87cznqb1sl.fsf@inria.fr> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=78.46.223.134; envelope-from=jbranso@dismail.de; helo=mx1.dismail.de X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1635378591; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=Tm0MAgqvKxqdaCvKTFRjEL5qj7m4tkl1Ovinr5kEj7g=; b=G2evsq6nsoOWtSCelH5DLSshBX5wj+xDzdMXTU1KERJ5pXzrMkPbYgFav4XKDbSbsYGFqj uwOTy88j3Jc7smIZRnit6NKQlF5YUVs1+Qy2mAbtcyae8r5CARt/oV1ytLuAKHP2ELc1lI BMDYNBvmMucpqHy69ZCYXcwSO6AGVvT1V4NZ9xRBpMzb2x1uTvy2PqhUUZDAGL9esJ93wB 3I0/nr0aYUsoeNSJbjLyn5nkWig6TCs26AKx7WMBTJtTBHSUNnxoz3CGKCjvYLShv9l2N6 afhxpamihQJX7szcTbjim4b0VeyExpfwoDTcjLORpT7UInOqdN6AcxkTiCRnaQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1635378591; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=PSa3jyUl6tKS7Rk77dPUk6XE8NFqqisbATW9CntXAjQx/0Kg4bNRQdWTNaWljL7fABtYeV z5WfwkevV79VShMx8qrB3P9oaQDttZMc4DNqwYLBCEisRCHfNkXZC3snDciiDDFlK8MxdB kU/8I7lE55/YKkssk1Ccz2uF1gOJL+ggeFKIwQg1ADWGsI6easJiSTs7Rb6OgS4a2kYVRT k7EH1YQ/+OI4cP1CAYROGpi70jjUGaz3YT9Ijm6nDwjLg7SrbzORfkcJKn8L0z75V61QeY OVgAv9Wuus6aLo9w4D0/5G9yfQtyj3OPgPxxJp+h+HWMYD7SPopUnALrnXHBNQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=dismail.de header.s=20190914 header.b=COPQreFz; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=dismail.de; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.12 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=dismail.de header.s=20190914 header.b=COPQreFz; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=dismail.de; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 96A09120EB X-Spam-Score: -2.12 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: B5XGsGouTgG3 October 27, 2021 6:51 PM, "Katherine Cox-Buday" wrote:=0A=0A> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes:=0A> =0A>> I = think a major goal of the process would be to formalize a minimum=0A>> an= d a maximum duration under which an RFC is under evaluation, and a=0A>> m= echanism to determine whether it=E2=80=99s accepted or withdrawn.=0A> =0A= > I think it's a good idea. The only contribution I can give is that I wo= uld not have known =3Dguix=0A> shell=3D was coming had I not been watchin= g the patches list. So in addition to formalizing what=0A> you've mention= ed, I suggest we also formalize a location to watch (guix-devel seems log= ical?).=0A =0AThat's why I didn't see guix shell coming. I don't follow = guix patches...=0A=0A> --=0A> Katherine