From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: swedebugia Subject: Re: Videos Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 14:56:40 +0200 Message-ID: <9e3545d3-a1db-947b-9f19-7e9700d8dda0@riseup.net> References: <87in76qzzk.fsf@elephly.net> <87a7shtkbl.fsf@gmail.com> <87a7sghk19.fsf@gnu.org> <87po1cpd3r.fsf@elephly.net> <87k1rknpz7.fsf@gmail.com> <1FBE5BC2-4C0E-4F85-BF27-847177AD6665@riseup.net> <87h8mg9ai6.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53402) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fQXxG-0005gn-QC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2018 08:54:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fQXxD-0004sX-Js for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2018 08:54:22 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:37565) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fQXxD-0004ra-Ah for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2018 08:54:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87h8mg9ai6.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Alex Vong Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org HI On 2018-06-05 23:41, Alex Vong wrote: > swedebugia writes: > >> Hi. >> >> On May 31, 2018 11:17:48 AM GMT+02:00, Pierre Neidhardt >> wrote: >>> Maybe a little off-topic, but if there ever is a need for GIFs, I've >>> recently worked on an Emacs package for high quality/compression rati= o >>> GIF recordings: >> Have you read this? >> https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/gif.en.html >> I like the idea of recording per action =F0=9F=98=80. Maybe an alterna= tive to >> GIF is available. > I think you should read the footnote: "Animated GIFs are a different > story ...". > > Also, the article is more of historical interest now as the first > paragraph indicates. A ha. I missed the footnote stating: According to this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GIF APNG exist as an=20 alternative. I have never used or seen it used though it is apparently=20 supported by modern browsers. GIFs are probably fine to use now the technology is old and widespread. --=20 --- Swedebugia