From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: Re: Why is IceCat now only 'supported' on Intel-systems? Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 16:29:09 +0100 Message-ID: <9a0db8a9-5521-a173-f1da-e115ee3008ea@tobias.gr> References: <87y400fk43.fsf@netris.org> <1047188c-73f6-58c8-b84f-e801ff049940@tobias.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WXkRnPnBb5G99tq9KodvUOnEJB5HG2n24" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38010) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cCTIc-0006Tp-M2 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 10:29:27 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cCTIX-0000Lh-Cf for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 10:29:24 -0500 Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]:48674) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cCTIX-0000Jz-6c for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 10:29:21 -0500 Received: from mfilter27-d.gandi.net (mfilter27-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.155]) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BD0341C0D7 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 16:29:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([IPv6:::ffff:217.70.183.197]) by mfilter27-d.gandi.net (mfilter27-d.gandi.net [::ffff:10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6GXJFt1coZ9H for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 16:29:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (d54C66B95.access.telenet.be [84.198.107.149]) (Authenticated sender: me@tobias.gr) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2AA3841C0C6 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 16:29:13 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <1047188c-73f6-58c8-b84f-e801ff049940@tobias.gr> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --WXkRnPnBb5G99tq9KodvUOnEJB5HG2n24 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Br5huANBqdjqMHQqDiAsawegChPxuW4VN"; protected-headers="v1" From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice To: guix-devel@gnu.org Message-ID: <9a0db8a9-5521-a173-f1da-e115ee3008ea@tobias.gr> Subject: Re: Why is IceCat now only 'supported' on Intel-systems? References: <87y400fk43.fsf@netris.org> <1047188c-73f6-58c8-b84f-e801ff049940@tobias.gr> In-Reply-To: <1047188c-73f6-58c8-b84f-e801ff049940@tobias.gr> --Br5huANBqdjqMHQqDiAsawegChPxuW4VN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 01/12/16 15:13, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > Most very likely my 7cba764 commit, =E2=80=98icecat: Use libjpeg-turbo = instead > of bundled libjpeg=E2=80=99[-turbo]. After some more poking around Hydra I might have been too eager to take the blame for this. I'll keep an eye on it, though. Kind regards, T G-R --Br5huANBqdjqMHQqDiAsawegChPxuW4VN-- --WXkRnPnBb5G99tq9KodvUOnEJB5HG2n24 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEqBAEBCgAUBQJYQEHGDRxtZUB0b2JpYXMuZ3IACgkQkczbm0hUG5loTAf/dOP+ jPZHkTTg2CLVYtQFzG2zkeZsMuG/wvQ3QmWO+1cSg63E4OAa/3hrmeyd6O29zIbM ZYDBFvdNiz0+ezPJB6m/25eGi+Rz7qdOqT2WDxDnBlFeRZvsOdcaHL+SYISO5kZg tDnOipx1zdAX9MM8UweyVDmwY1vGrbh8gNK5QxvITQytVMm2rYi6ThUAlKO9yVQQ OdETr3N1pgy3ce0hwQX06A5I1SMbSg6S6UVxKWL8kRJd6vm2wIlxPw5JNsFZMGIf ULWg8D57dpIkrY8iDTxjVbsF0pdhVGLTncvpWZyoC4jRcwiFw5HugyVB2p56stiI fAbwI+wLUi2JbLFsSg== =NQxU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WXkRnPnBb5G99tq9KodvUOnEJB5HG2n24--