From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vincent Legoll Subject: Re: Progress on the Hurd; new state of wip-hurd-vm Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 17:32:07 +0200 Message-ID: <93704715-88da-2d3b-fd51-d7bc99d6b346@gmail.com> References: <87ftczttql.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60170) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQBvY-00010V-Dt for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 11:32:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQBvX-0002pk-R3 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 11:32:12 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x430.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::430]:40379) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQBvX-0002mL-EO for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 11:32:11 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-x430.google.com with SMTP id k13so7696465wrw.7 for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 08:32:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.2] (se167-1-82-242-148-1.fbx.proxad.net. [82.242.148.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i97sm42776353wri.1.2020.04.19.08.32.08 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 19 Apr 2020 08:32:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87ftczttql.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org Hello, I just had a tour of that branch, it looks like there are interesting patches wrt cross-building, aren't those ready for upstream (core- updates maybe) ? I'm looking at the first one (for perl) for example... I've been trying to cross-compile the binary-tarball to new arches, without any success, all failing the same way, on perl... And when it hit me that there is a recurring theme in those failures I found a few issues and ML posts about the same problem. So, what's the status of those patches ? -- Vincent Legoll