From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id uE6EOH5g3l40IwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 15:59:58 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id 6DFhNH5g3l6uAgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 15:59:58 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 705A69404C7 for ; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 15:59:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:43986 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jiKBp-0005Ep-5Q for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 11:59:57 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37386) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jiKBE-0004p1-NX for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 11:59:20 -0400 Received: from mailrelay.tugraz.at ([129.27.2.202]:25820) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jiKBC-0006zh-B2 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 11:59:19 -0400 Received: from nijino.local (212-88-11-71.hdsl.highway.telekom.at [212.88.11.71]) by mailrelay.tugraz.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49gdGh1vV0z3wNG; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 17:59:08 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tugraz.at; s=mailrelay; t=1591631948; bh=m5Yth9Zan6DIUC+RdTOskub8Ywz5jB8z07RXQeIbHds=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To; b=bWpB0jEgde+UHwddrEpm8sw7DPM69qJpLJgKibDXQFrhSMX4wZ8HEH0FfL25KaL6P hkqiBGFg28q+WVpma2/kd5p34aPCVh5vXd9VShL6I7Ckjd2Kri8xlEDw+KFdF1KGPe HqEMryz8DuF2u5ga6sO7lbzNLuD5wKGK+JDn5gbY= Message-ID: <91a0739fc4f7e2984db315b4787b64025a0fb464.camel@student.tugraz.at> Subject: Lightweight Emacs (or "GTK+ minimal) From: Leo Prikler To: mail@ambrevar.xyz Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 17:59:06 +0200 In-Reply-To: 87zh9dhowd.fsf@ambrevar.xyz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TUG-Backscatter-control: bt4lQm5Tva3SBgCuw0EnZw X-Spam-Scanner: SpamAssassin 3.003001 X-Spam-Score-relay: -1.9 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 on 129.27.10.116 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=129.27.2.202; envelope-from=leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at; helo=mailrelay.tugraz.at X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/08 11:59:09 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=tugraz.at header.s=mailrelay header.b=bWpB0jEg; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=student.tugraz.at; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.71 X-TUID: A2gFJzPWx+Az Hello, Pierre > Also I wonder why guile is in there. According to guix graph, guile is pulled by gnutls. > 1. Does anyone have a recipe for Emacs without GTK+ (that can also > display pictures)? Not directly, but you could try building it with motif (package lesstif) or Lucid/Athena (requires at least libxaw, not sure if all dependencies for that are packaged). > 2. Can we make a GTK+-minimal? > At first glance, we could strip some 300 MiB from the the 700 MiB > GTK+ closure size. What features of GTK+ would this minimal variant include/exclude respectively? Regards, Leo