From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: rennes@openmailbox.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: grep: Fix for gnulib library.
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 09:56:20 -0600
Message-ID: <917457c47697a09610eb44a89cd3e4c6@openmailbox.org>
References: <03bd79adfd93b2e828510a3250e6690d@openmailbox.org>
	<87o9x882ym.fsf@gnu.org>
	<45ea0fec-4129-f996-9022-c3358241c1c9@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40138)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rennes@openmailbox.org>) id 1cmjQg-0006sl-LN
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:59:39 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rennes@openmailbox.org>) id 1cmjQd-0007NY-Li
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:59:38 -0500
In-Reply-To: <45ea0fec-4129-f996-9022-c3358241c1c9@gmail.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Hello Ludovic, Manolis,

>> Looks like we missed this =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99 cycle.  :-/
>>=20
>> To apply it without triggering a full rebuild, you could instead add a
>> phase that invokes =E2=80=98patch=E2=80=99 to apply it, only when the=20
>> cross-compilation
>> target or system is GNU/Hurd.
>>=20
>> Like:
>>=20
>>   ,@(if (gnu/hurd?)
>>         `((add-before 'configure 'patch =E2=80=A6))
>>         '())  ;nothing
>>=20
>> Could you try that?
>=20
> Even though this would work, maybe we should wait for the next
> core-updates circle in order to avoid more (if (hurd)..) patches.
>=20

Yes, we can wait for the next cycle.