From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id yOcxGV6mzmFlWgAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 31 Dec 2021 07:42:38 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS id gHXzEV6mzmHgNAAAG6o9tA (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 31 Dec 2021 07:42:38 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21B4129721 for ; Fri, 31 Dec 2021 07:42:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:51374 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n3BcM-0008SS-Gf for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 31 Dec 2021 01:42:24 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39242) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n3BaS-0008RG-78 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Dec 2021 01:40:25 -0500 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:38868) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n3BaN-0000RD-4c for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Dec 2021 01:40:20 -0500 Received: from fews2.riseup.net (fews2-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.riseup.net", Issuer "R3" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4JQFrK4RrwzF2qM; Thu, 30 Dec 2021 22:40:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1640932817; bh=DsZpq8OVS8/7Xl91gB0RH7nCGhYtzw/WfNXdqT3mP8c=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=rQuHY7kz3ssiaAti5eUecoTkf/38cTtVFodv80B+xQLn3Jtz8b+/TEpEMJqY35Ovc AjnJaFvRvK0HTJPBhts91iDe18B3VIgOqqImPfdUjHjoRheDH2SGunfTphcMdeUntP XlaVfH7JAo8Ny9NKzW+PLqIq9b20YoH5/QSXlfh8= X-Riseup-User-ID: 9A2B9FCE9CC8A56D32600AA3A5A2B6D88F10295BD2154CB8E69490BFE0F64A13 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews2.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4JQFrG5TTtz1y4f; Thu, 30 Dec 2021 22:40:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8e0a270331137206e0b0a253ec2be9074ebee667.camel@riseup.net> Subject: Re: Organising Guix Days From: adriano To: Blake Shaw , guix-devel@gnu.org Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2021 07:40:10 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87mtkiiz0e.fsf@nonconstructivism.com> References: <87mtkiiz0e.fsf@nonconstructivism.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=198.252.153.129; envelope-from=randomlooser@riseup.net; helo=mx1.riseup.net X-Spam_score_int: -8 X-Spam_score: -0.9 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.9 / 5.0 requ) DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Manolis Ragkousis , Oliver Propst Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; none X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: QrUbyE7bVhA4 Il giorno gio, 30/12/2021 alle 09.53 +0700, Blake Shaw ha scritto: > > Hi folks, > > Regarding the presentation I'm putting together on the Guile > Documentation, while I have enough material right now to send out a > basic presentation that covers what I believe to be the dominant, > glaring issues of the composition and organization of the docs as > well > as how I would go about restructuring them if everyone agrees with > the > proposed edits, I'm also starting to uncover some more nuanced > issues with some of the pedagogical folly that appears throughout the > text, and so a few more weeks would probably result in a more > comprehensive study. > > So I was thinking, in that case, should I just make the presentation > for > Guix Days? That way it could also be presented at a time when other, > perhaps related projects and issues are coming to the fore. > I'd say: if it's not too much hassle for you, prepare the "reduced" version for the Guix Days In such version, you could just hint that there's more to come As for the more nuanced version, you could take your time and do it when you feel it's ready I can't wait <3 Thanks !