From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hartmut Goebel Subject: Re: I don't understand the Curiass WebUI Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 15:24:26 +0200 Message-ID: <8a4235c3-04ae-d3f9-8aaf-eb5ca54489e6@crazy-compilers.com> References: <6b33fa02-36b4-d274-5ff0-c93b4303666a@crazy-compilers.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------190E5967DC57E0426D728049" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55761) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iFecL-0004CE-Ag for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 09:24:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iFecJ-0006Fu-O8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 09:24:33 -0400 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:36993) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iFecJ-0006FE-DN for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 09:24:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: =?UTF-8?Q?G=c3=a1bor_Boskovits?= Cc: guix-devel This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------190E5967DC57E0426D728049 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, Am 02.10.19 um 14:32 schrieb G=C3=A1bor Boskovits: > > You are looking for guix-master. The interface shows for a given > evalution only > the packages that were scheduled because of the difference between the > evaluation > and the previous one. IC. I assume old hydra was not able to evaluate that fast, thus the there have been more packages for each evaluation. Now e.g. ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/7761 contains the rebuild of exactly one package (next) - which is hard to spot sine it is buried by many "image" builds. > I believe it would make sense to have an aggregate package view, > showing the current status of the packages, and the evaluation when > they were last attempted, > and the result of that attempt. Wdyt? This would be helpful, esp. if it is placed somewhat prominently. Another possibility would be improve the search-filters. FWIW: Check when a package has been build the last time (for some specific platform). --=20 Regards Hartmut Goebel | Hartmut Goebel | h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com | | www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible | --------------190E5967DC57E0426D728049 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,

Am 02.10.19 um 14:32 schrieb G=C3=A1bo= r Boskovits:

You are looking for guix-master. The interface shows for a given evalution only
the packages that were scheduled because of the difference between the evaluation

and the previous one.

IC. I assume old hydra was not able to evaluate that fast, thus the there have been more packages for each evaluation.

Now e.g. ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/7761 contains the rebuild of exactly one package (next) - which is hard to spot sine it is buried by many "image" builds.

I believe it would make sense to have an aggregate package view,

showing the current status of the packages, and the evaluation when they were last attempted,

and the result of that attempt. Wdyt?

This would be helpful, esp. if it is placed somewhat prominently. Another possibility would be improve the search-filters.

FWIW: Check when a package has been build the last time (for some specific platform).

--=20
Regards
Hartmut Goebel

| Hartmut Goebel          | h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com   =
            |
| www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impo=
ssible |

--------------190E5967DC57E0426D728049--