From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Brasero, or gnome without gnome Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 13:19:42 +0200 Message-ID: <87zjqqbnzl.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20131002124146.GA15506@debian> <20131002180223.GA873@debian> <874n8zsc3c.fsf@gnu.org> <20131002205600.GA1680@debian> <20131002211808.GA26447@debian> <87li2bnwf9.fsf@gnu.org> <20131003110744.GB6327@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54600) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VRh1Y-00071v-4e for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 07:24:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VRh1S-0005gs-0z for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 07:24:52 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:52609) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VRh1R-0005gd-Rb for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 07:24:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20131003110744.GB6327@debian> (Andreas Enge's message of "Thu, 3 Oct 2013 13:07:44 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Andreas Enge skribis: > On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 12:24:26AM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: [...] >> job ;-)), I think we should support GNOME as it is somewhat related to >> GNU. > > That is true. But I feel about GNOME as you feel about KDE, and am not ov= erly > motivated to do more work on it, so it would be good if some volunteer > GNOME users stepped forward to take over. Yes, message received. > Would it be okay to push the current moderately usable brasero package > so as not to lose the work? Definitely! Ludo=E2=80=99.