From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: guix pull
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 13:17:03 +0200
Message-ID: <87zjdrrjkg.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <CAKrPhPPnU-83x6uTB8upsbvzo4ZAa1tTEk_uq2gvgAk6+fF-=Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<87r3zavn6r.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAKrPhPN7D1c4jXjYdH_SmWFj=CNMW7Z2=GRBG+whyd9NVBVMKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40897)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1XW1cI-0006Rz-Fa
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 07:17:18 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1XW1cD-0000v1-TN
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 07:17:14 -0400
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a01:474::1]:53226)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1XW1cD-0000uF-H3
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 07:17:09 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAKrPhPN7D1c4jXjYdH_SmWFj=CNMW7Z2=GRBG+whyd9NVBVMKQ@mail.gmail.com>
	(Federico Beffa's message of "Mon, 22 Sep 2014 11:53:21 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Federico Beffa <beffa@ieee.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Federico Beffa <beffa@ieee.org> skribis:

> I believe to have found another problem after doing a "guix pull": In
> the directory $HOME/.config/guix/latest/guix there is a file called
> "config.scm.in". Shouldn't this file be processed and output
> "config.scm"?

No, it=E2=80=99s on purpose: the goal is to keep using the already-installed
(guix config), which contains the right file names etc.

Ludo=E2=80=99.