From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: wip-gobject-introspection
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 23:51:03 +0100
Message-ID: <87zj9hdns8.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <CAKrPhPOmcWvFTxUyfg=Raq_=Ng0SK1==TCYxqqOEnVH+Bek=uQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87mw5l3x39.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAKrPhPO7MYTOqU1tZjr4BOtybOGCJ02rgqViBXJpOYwEiE8FQQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87egqtjosx.fsf@netris.org>
	<CAKrPhPP559a=aPRxT3Vd5+UBWJ7KFX2qZm4NVhqa5=5q2OYSMw@mail.gmail.com>
	<87a91hjdeb.fsf@netris.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48862)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1YCcD7-0002h7-F2
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 17:51:18 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1YCcD2-0006Z4-GC
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 17:51:17 -0500
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a01:474::1]:44127)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1YCcD2-0006Yz-9Q
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 17:51:12 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87a91hjdeb.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Sat, 17
	Jan 2015 16:38:52 -0500")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Cc: Guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>, Federico Beffa <beffa@ieee.org>

Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> skribis:

> You're right to be wary of rebasing public branches, but I think it's
> okay with short-lived experimental branches like this.  If it turns out
> that someone else has done work on it, the situation is easily remedied.

Agreed.  There=E2=80=99s the unwritten rule inherited from Guile that a bra=
nch
prefixed with =E2=80=9Cwip-=E2=80=9D may be rebased.

Ludo=E2=80=99.