From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich =?utf-8?Q?Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1?=
	=?utf-8?Q?=2FKammer?=)
Subject: Re: =?utf-8?B?4oCYYnNkLXN0eWxl4oCZIOKGkiDigJhub24tY29weWxlZnQ=?=
	=?utf-8?B?4oCZ?=
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 15:35:26 +0100
Message-ID: <87zj7e5nwx.fsf@taylan.uni.cx>
References: <87vbi3whu7.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42665)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <taylanbayirli@gmail.com>) id 1YX9dd-0002Hq-S1
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 10:35:35 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <taylanbayirli@gmail.com>) id 1YX9da-0002ls-FS
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 10:35:33 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87vbi3whu7.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\=
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Sat, 14 Mar 2015 19:32:16 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: Guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes:

> I=E2=80=99ve just renamed =E2=80=98bsd-style=E2=80=99 in (guix licenses) =
to =E2=80=98non-copyleft=E2=80=99,
> which is less ambiguous (see
> <http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#BSD-style>.)
>
> (The old binding is still there to avoid breakage, but we=E2=80=99ll remo=
ve it
> eventually.)
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo=E2=80=99.

Sounds like a good decision; I asked myself when to use bsd-style before
because the BSD licenses are each pretty specific and also distinct.
(Are there even any non-BSD licenses that use the BSD-style numbered
list of clauses?)

Another one of my confusions was why we have "x11-style" but not
"expat-style".  But I guess non-copyleft covers that now.

Taylan