From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mathieu Lirzin Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] emacs: Add 'guix-devel-use-current-module'. Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 11:19:27 +0200 Message-ID: <87zj2gbpwg.fsf@openmailbox.org> References: <1437814197-6321-1-git-send-email-alezost@gmail.com> <1437814197-6321-5-git-send-email-alezost@gmail.com> <87r3nwrrze.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87mvyj2ufq.fsf@gmail.com> <874mkrggsi.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87si8ass9h.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36118) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZK14u-0003Gx-TW for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 05:21:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZK14p-0005kP-UA for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 05:21:40 -0400 Received: from smtp14.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.48]:43916) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZK14p-0005kF-L7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 05:21:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87si8ass9h.fsf@gmail.com> (Alex Kost's message of "Sun, 26 Jul 2015 21:11:54 +0300") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Alex Kost Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Alex Kost writes: >>> Mathieu Lirzin (2015-07-25 21:51 +0300) wrote: >>> >>> I don't know whether there is such (or any other) suggestion anywhere. >>> But since that was just an example, not a recommendation (not even a >>> suggestion), I think it doesn't matter what key binding to use there. >>> Do you have any preference? What about "C-H-M-s-u"? :-) >> >> I agree it's not really important for advanced Emacs users who will have >> no problem choosing something adapted to their setup. Nonetheless IMHO >> consistency and simplicity helps newcomers to understand, So I will be >> in favour of anything that follows this convention. :) >> >> (global-set-key (kbd "C-c ") foo-function-callable-anywhere) >> >> (define-key bar-mode-map >> (kbd "C-c C-") >> 'foo-function-for-bar-mode) > > According to (info "(elisp) Key Binding Conventions"), 'C-c LETTER' > bindings are reserved for users, so I think using "C-c u" in that > example is absolutely fine, don't you agree? I agree. Sorry for the noise and thanks for retrieving this reference. ;) -- Mathieu Lirzin