From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Tor hidden services Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 11:11:41 +0100 Message-ID: <87zixxp12a.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87mvtzvvrh.fsf@gnu.org> <20151128193744.GA10691@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44665) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a2yxQ-0000YM-2W for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 05:11:48 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a2yxM-0002QO-1k for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 05:11:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20151128193744.GA10691@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Sat, 28 Nov 2015 14:37:44 -0500") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel Leo Famulari skribis: > Are there any technical advantages to using lsh instead of OpenSSH, or > is the primary advantage the copyleft license? Various things are designed differently, which you may or may not like (for instance the SPKI-inspired =E2=80=98lsh-authorize=E2=80=99 vs. ~/.ssh/authorized_keys, =E2=80=98lshg=E2=80=99 on the client side, use = of Nettle rather than OpenSSL for crypto primitives, etc.) I like lshd but my growing concern is that it hasn=E2=80=99t seen new relea= ses in a while and its default cipher suites need to be updated, for instance. Ludo=E2=80=99.