From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Cosmetical change: remove inconsistent "$file ends here"? Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 10:38:41 +0200 Message-ID: <87zims4dwu.fsf@gnu.org> References: <871t09t6f1.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <87a8ewl6tq.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39773) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bpAOC-00032w-ID for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 04:38:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bpAO8-0000hf-Dq for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 04:38:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87a8ewl6tq.fsf@gmail.com> (Alex Kost's message of "Sun, 25 Sep 2016 11:30:41 +0300") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Alex Kost Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Alex Kost skribis: > ng0 (2016-09-24 20:00 +0000) wrote: > >> We should either be consistent with this in all files or remove this >> altogether in my opinion. >> >>> ng0@shadowwalker ~/src/guix/guix-no-changes$ egrep -nr "ends here" >>> gnu/build/vm.scm:323:;;; vm.scm ends here > ... >> What do you think? > > I don't know what the original purpose of this convention is, it was > probably invented in those ancient times when dinosaurs walked by > streets, but I kinda like these "ends here" things :-) Yeah, I add them occasionally out of habit, but it=E2=80=99s not useful. > Anyway, I vote for leaving them and adding the missing ones. I vote for the status quo. :-) There=E2=80=99s not much value in spending= time either way IMO. Ludo=E2=80=99.