From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Staging (was [PATCH] gnu: mesa: Update to 13.0.1.)
Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2016 21:52:57 +0100
Message-ID: <87zikb5sd2.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20161130120602.4342-1-mbakke@fastmail.com>
	<87h96nspvg.fsf@gnu.org>
	<874m2ntvu9.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<87shq7mew1.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87h96md127.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<87bmws2e3b.fsf@elephly.net> <20161204180557.GA2892@jasmine>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60370)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1cDdmT-0002CF-RT
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2016 15:53:06 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1cDdmP-0007ny-22
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2016 15:53:05 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20161204180557.GA2892@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Sun,
	4 Dec 2016 13:05:57 -0500")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:

> On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 11:17:12AM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>>=20
>> Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com> writes:
>>=20
>> > Pushed to staging anyway!
>>=20
>> Just a note: the original plan was to freeze staging on November 30 and
>> merge on December 7 (Wednesday).  I think it=E2=80=99s time to actually =
freeze
>> staging now.
>
> Is there a reason to wait? Or should we start evaluating staging on
> Hydra today?

No there=E2=80=99s no reason to wait indeed!  (I emailed you later today on=
 this
topic.  :-))

Ludo=E2=80=99.