From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Staging (was [PATCH] gnu: mesa: Update to 13.0.1.) Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2016 21:52:57 +0100 Message-ID: <87zikb5sd2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20161130120602.4342-1-mbakke@fastmail.com> <87h96nspvg.fsf@gnu.org> <874m2ntvu9.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87shq7mew1.fsf@gnu.org> <87h96md127.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87bmws2e3b.fsf@elephly.net> <20161204180557.GA2892@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org> Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60370) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1cDdmT-0002CF-RT for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2016 15:53:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1cDdmP-0007ny-22 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2016 15:53:05 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20161204180557.GA2892@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Sun, 4 Dec 2016 13:05:57 -0500") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." <guix-devel.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>, <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>, <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org> To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis: > On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 11:17:12AM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >>=20 >> Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com> writes: >>=20 >> > Pushed to staging anyway! >>=20 >> Just a note: the original plan was to freeze staging on November 30 and >> merge on December 7 (Wednesday). I think it=E2=80=99s time to actually = freeze >> staging now. > > Is there a reason to wait? Or should we start evaluating staging on > Hydra today? No there=E2=80=99s no reason to wait indeed! (I emailed you later today on= this topic. :-)) Ludo=E2=80=99.