From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marius Bakke Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: moc: Update to 2.5.2. Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 18:39:53 +0100 Message-ID: <87ziix7axi.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> References: <86lguizbpt.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87k2a28l7t.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <86h956z9ng.fsf@openmailbox.org> <861swaz8i1.fsf@openmailbox.org> <86wpe2xppr.fsf@openmailbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43887) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cRMsR-0003G2-Rj for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 12:40:00 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cRMsO-0000qS-Ow for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 12:39:59 -0500 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:54882) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cRMsO-0000qG-KE for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 12:39:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <86wpe2xppr.fsf@openmailbox.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Kei Kebreau Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Kei Kebreau writes: > Thanks for the review! The macros you mention were indeed introduced in > this version. Wow, good catch! > Does this commit message look good to you? > > * gnu/packages/music.scm (moc): Update to 2.5.2. > [source](modules, snippet): Remove timestamps from the output. I'd just write "[source]: Add snippet to make it reproducible.". > Does the ghc binary work for you? I get complaints about the ncursesw > library missing. I suspect it has to do with the LD_LIBRARY_PATH, as > seen in the ghc package definition. Looks like you're right. I've filed a bug report: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25421 Thank you! --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlh2beoACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPo3VwgA0woIT6kaYxif6wQUVjmHo5a27wpCHXXfF7GKgbrOt9Jf44kty2LlKHUb bhauIZEX8MTOP0L31nF27qNknlcUVC9Ic1GOgSDS6z03rmRahNOCq5omo9fSTa8E NC6ivZdjiSE/DFC7imePniKFhyLRRKi+UqqSs2wQNKWGGwWgMfNHCYi3m2EO3UEV 8BrRrlsa1/TMkhDof1yYjj32xU/GKHgEFcjTdnYQYukRTjk24im1c4BFNzHg2fy3 GK+yx/e43Mc4x789Q5K6f4QfS9yEnriG7Ux3AmTmGCnmoVhKxY08eqBKdbwvjhE6 BaT2BWRwenbck6QzIkvGcNW+Wne0Pg== =otOK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--