From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: 03/07: gnu: libfive: Add snippet, enable tests and remove obsolete phase. Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 17:19:48 +0200 Message-ID: <87zi1zi5pn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20180419095903.21090.36781@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20180419095904.D9E2D204EE@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87in8nidqp.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32974) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f9BLk-0008LW-Tq for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 11:19:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f9BLj-0006vP-Sh for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 11:19:52 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a0c:e300::1]:54388) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f9BLj-0006ul-Ls for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 11:19:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87in8nidqp.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Thu, 19 Apr 2018 08:26:22 -0400") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Mark H Weaver Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi Mark, Mark H Weaver skribis: > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > >> civodul pushed a commit to branch master >> in repository guix. >> >> commit 0818c01aefbaa7ecce5e310ec5f70886850a7f9c >> Author: Diego Nicola Barbato >> Date: Fri Apr 6 13:43:54 2018 +0200 >> >> gnu: libfive: Add snippet, enable tests and remove obsolete phase. >>=20=20=20=20=20 >> * gnu/packages/engineering.scm (libfive)[source]: Add snippet to >> remove bundled catch. > > [...] > >> + (snippet >> + ;; Remove bundled catch since we provide our own. >> + '(delete-file "libfive/test/catch.hpp")))) > > It would be good to try to avoid adding more phases or snippets that > return unspecified values. I fixed every snippet in 'core-updates', but > I guess more passes will be needed as these errors continue to be > introduced. Right, apologies for that; I=E2=80=99ve fixed this particular instance. I look forward to the day where we can ignore those return values and assume an exception is thrown when something goes wrong. Thankfully the work you=E2=80=99ve been doing on =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99 should hel= p us get there! Ludo=E2=80=99.