From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludovic.courtes@inria.fr (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: hpcguix-web, channels, and inferiors Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2018 11:15:14 +0200 Message-ID: <87zhvs69gd.fsf@inria.fr> References: <87pnxqkbmg.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhvv5c4n.fsf@lassieur.org> <875zyi191w.fsf@inria.fr> <87sh1l62ge.fsf@lassieur.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44454) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g8MCg-0004rt-Du for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2018 05:15:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g8MCd-00015s-Ai for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2018 05:15:22 -0400 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.83]:23346) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g8MCc-00013y-TL for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2018 05:15:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87sh1l62ge.fsf@lassieur.org> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur"'s message of "Thu, 04 Oct 2018 19:34:09 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Cc: guix-devel Hi, Cl=C3=A9ment Lassieur skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > >> Hello, >> >> Cl=C3=A9ment Lassieur skribis: [...] >>> Would it make sense to integrate it into Cuirass? We could browse >>> packages on Cuirass and to each package would be associated a link to >>> its build status on different architectures, etc. >>> >>> What do you think? >> >> Good question. Some sort of integration is desirable, with links as you >> mention. Now Cuirass is not specifically about packages, conceptually >> at least, so IMO having both features in the same tool would =E2=80=9Cbr= eak the >> abstraction.=E2=80=9D > > Yes I agree. I wonder though: is there a way to know if a specific > derivation is a package? In general no. Of course one could play trick to try and guess whether it corresponds to a package, but that should be avoided IMO. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.