From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Re-approaching package tagging
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 22:06:17 +0100
Message-ID: <87zhsylhdi.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <875zvsq8ov.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87imzrgjit.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87h8fa7ums.fsf@dustycloud.org>
	<CAJ3okZ3CSPOZGsHm7w6-pYV4JgOuR3+On5sQrtDqdFWg8hMNeg@mail.gmail.com>
	<871s6dwob2.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAJ3okZ3s5F89uMK5i4uAf+sYGc+hm2OGSx14JYrPn-YChNGcEg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJ3okZ1nTmso_zCJh8MUuc-tvhCdcMjapamZjUNA58sSH4fZFg@mail.gmail.com>
	<87pntwskgn.fsf@gnu.org> <87h8f8xy6u.fsf@dustycloud.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50115)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1gaS6Z-00075V-Bt
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 16:13:11 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1gaS6W-0004kA-8f
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 16:13:11 -0500
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:58330)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1gaS6W-0004k6-3C
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 16:13:08 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87h8f8xy6u.fsf@dustycloud.org> (Christopher Lemmer Webber's
	message of "Thu, 20 Dec 2018 05:57:45 -0500")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Christopher Lemmer Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org>
Cc: Guix Devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

Hi,

Christopher Lemmer Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org> skribis:

> I wonder for keywords that would be awkward to "force" into the
> description if we could have an "extra keywords" section?  Then we can
> skip tagging, but in case a package's description didn't comfortably fit
> that word, you can still find it by it.  Then it's not separate tagging,
> just extra words to find a package by that the description didn't say.

Good question.  I don=E2=80=99t think we=E2=80=99ve really had concerns abo=
ut =E2=80=9Cextra
words=E2=80=9D in the past (and the regexps are also matched against the fi=
le
name for instance, which can also help), but let=E2=80=99s keep that sugges=
tion
in mind if that happens!

Ludo=E2=80=99.