From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: Speeding up =?utf-8?B?4oCcZ3VpeCBwdWxs4oCdOg==?= splitting modules Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2020 00:29:27 +0100 Message-ID: <87zhetshbc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87k1657i7j.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38784) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iqQCC-0004sc-2C for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 18:29:33 -0500 In-Reply-To: (zimoun's message of "Fri, 10 Jan 2020 13:53:38 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: zimoun Cc: Guix Devel Hello, zimoun skribis: > So knowing where the cycles are could help to transform the DaG (not > fully acyclic yet) to a DAG. :-) Unfortunately, the module graph necessarily contains cycles. The only way to avoid them would be to have exactly one module per package, given that the package graph is acyclic. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.