From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 2C9NHlQIwV5ZDgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 17 May 2020 09:48:04 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id MHZJGlQIwV4oVwAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 17 May 2020 09:48:04 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B4E294042C for ; Sun, 17 May 2020 09:48:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:38676 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jaFtq-0000Hd-E7 for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 17 May 2020 05:48:02 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38570) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jaFth-0000HK-TY for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2020 05:47:53 -0400 Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.21]:51817) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jaFtg-0008E9-MH for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2020 05:47:53 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BBD657A8; Sun, 17 May 2020 05:47:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 17 May 2020 05:47:51 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=fm2; bh=It/K2eJ40tuqHvih+FB1yUVXzW ea+sOo5v2hlR+pgg8=; b=kyaBtV/GBLQuihbDC+43EIRyGARbxGNUKCVhEOZ02q nLoy7v/ISCPOXq+/kaSfXUZaq2S9Y0x0RFOmX9Sb+l0WDaunEF5mhYxz2Votn728 2FL2KDI/RDBy1f5I0HloME8uwRmmlLbMUCJz54tQHG/WEyNgZgTMrSa3mBpjZIHP fXDQa7KWlwGQV7BhfcoevO15NqkgVDvpzywsyYH6jkjr7bA6m+HeVDXtHD629uYS 3zrUZwN4c/Hf789+TnZSjwL4ayV8KiUaL6WAb69HEfMi5Vy7MvZLDoXtysncM7ef xJQdMDJUWa1Zca/et5DzBYGVQt838dOgzxUTzNz9c9fQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=It/K2e J40tuqHvih+FB1yUVXzWea+sOo5v2hlR+pgg8=; b=Tue0WrEY0ELiUZOe8s9yAN CtBoOpLzY9jOVWByFfN1FogAZf9pW3X3kAvkboq0pdUlvUBEwa5jc9eupKHbzOoc P+uT1o92Je2lHOmmrDp6tzvnQzwFeavqO7zW2Vw7/0j5MSrGcvmrS1Sl2eJ//AOO LaNGHiGVHRZC5i/N2M87ow9LMZX1pSZG+jj7eZrk31nS+xJWv4aY8ZZnyglzPbQl P9QUDzlLnDp9fSbTJsaIqU5qxXRFWodsxEZMwiBk4Xcy4aRhZWQj9FVgsdp/kfkM 7ve01CFGAEXQ6SAMZKsJCeP+FUVelNfiDf8d0HHpmkLTIp7K6qeki6q1/i2Ef/Pw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedruddtfedgvddtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucgfrhhlucfvnfffucdludejmdenucfjughrpefhvf fujghffgffkfggtgesghdtreertdertdenucfhrhhomhepofgrrhhiuhhsuceurghkkhgv uceomhgsrghkkhgvsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepue euudetheetuefgvdeiffffhfduffevleeutdduhfdttdejtdfgveefieetvdegnecuffho mhgrihhnpehmvghsrgefugdrohhrghenucfkphepkeegrddvtddvrdeikedrjeehnecuve hluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhgsrghkkhgv sehfrghsthhmrghilhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (ti0006q161-2604.bb.online.no [84.202.68.75]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 31BCC3280067; Sun, 17 May 2020 05:47:50 -0400 (EDT) From: Marius Bakke To: Pierre Neidhardt , guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: Out-of-date Mesa In-Reply-To: <878shrht9e.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> References: <878shrht9e.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.29.3 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/26.3 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sun, 17 May 2020 11:47:43 +0200 Message-ID: <87zha6sxj4.fsf@devup.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.147.123.21; envelope-from=mbakke@fastmail.com; helo=wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/17 05:47:51 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=fastmail.com header.s=fm2 header.b=kyaBtV/G; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=Tue0WrEY; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=fastmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.31 X-TUID: 1dVMF7zouKe+ --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Pierre Neidhardt writes: > Hi! > > I see that our Mesa 19.3.4 is out-of-date. 20.0.0 was released last February and > 20.0.7 was released on May 14th: > > https://mesa3d.org/ The 'staging' branch has Mesa 20.0.7. > I'm wondering why a recent Mesa wasn't including in the last core-update > merge. Any specific reason? Because 'core-updates' has has been "frozen" for a long time, and concerns itself with more low-level packages. Mesa typically gets updated on 'staging' despite the massive rebuild count. But no one has made the effort to update Mesa until recently. The Vulkan packages are probably out of date too, as Rutger appears to have moved on. Help wanted! --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAl7BCD8ACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPobiAgApDvRXXJHWdQSrVYWndK+z9cSDluwPmhYqqzc0bmCW8KhxG39+CLh2nkJ Vw+jNagalyvX/UhLyVyxK/lQ4GV+hEWVV75xn1LlHMsEkC6Cm+kodcI/eU5M6AwD EVDAvvFq/eAAA94cU+ufpBrX7ZsSJKEIxe129GrI3412G0GMc1/IBkr8C/VfTMQ3 42vcTS+QPjICidYvd7hchdyTED2F/AsbyD0vB9fXX68ANGm927Esgyx478T1uYDa yILeYOwuKiwKX6oirQu5suFgVreKuMx1qAw4ChwOlfhQAAF0t1suCVuLz1e9D9wR s8mEwbOq/uaHB5wJW6ybupqT+iiIPg== =Ox/0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--