From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 2OVAKavGt1/gcQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 13:37:47 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id 4LcaJavGt19+aAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 13:37:47 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 716C7940485 for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 13:37:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:34106 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kg6bi-0004bv-73 for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 08:37:46 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36234) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kg6bW-0004Zc-Rz for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 08:37:34 -0500 Received: from sender4-of-o51.zoho.com ([136.143.188.51]:21146) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kg6bU-0002iq-Lv; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 08:37:34 -0500 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1605879449; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=G7CNOPWlioQpVG97i9Fv6UPXmVeuXzweWLAFHG4IDuzHMWmIJoHkp6yA+XnxqI5RqSnwug7Q8o90oZQqjomqK0eZ7eHz4pT+lwK+7Og3fZ/2p0+sZJOvDVCrJIkrhQChKOuj16jXHpFMkmpVcx4VcUNK9zeT3R78AR7/b272I3U= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1605879449; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To; bh=swnZmCO6qlVOmNmtrfM/tzIo7a0tsnCCdmH43tlJAhM=; b=K1PM4dXFtSlfj03ptrhxPiczNAXNp6SZ+XNUtFLXD76JfD9gHKzOe5t7GS8crgF1bmFIIixnQP1oQRbBnu7bCMvYS6nK9YQzRcVayqtwn/ezEjIOc3Ryc4cE4d34CR8d5+GazT7Zxg0AyDuTZp58UiJCClHXCfrhgNq5pnuTlTQ= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1605879449; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=swnZmCO6qlVOmNmtrfM/tzIo7a0tsnCCdmH43tlJAhM=; b=A7fyDrz9G1Vi6HtDuUUhTkffWL46cKJtz7LXtKdkhf/j5HBKGbDGjeF9bIF8O6oF mXtCUfERxI2HsvGD/VOx/I4Wb1NEfRHgBWcXlgSX62FnAiYkJfi/KxzSGg2w7VgaA6G G1bDcYYn20SSn+1ybKv+UOvpE41hrqvtVyMTbU7w= Received: from localhost (p54ad4f27.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.173.79.39]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1605879447820275.4748544286672; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 05:37:27 -0800 (PST) References: <86tutnmvyn.fsf@gmail.com> <63ad286432442f3c6c22acf60b50632d1a4d4b8d.camel@gnu.org> <0f3a95cbcbefec60a9a239f39eefa7a991272dc9.camel@gnu.org> <873615aw3m.fsf@elephly.net> <63ba88365933ab9878eaa040ee4190ffdebbc41a.camel@gnu.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: Roel Janssen Subject: Re: Updating to latest Bioconductor release In-reply-to: <63ba88365933ab9878eaa040ee4190ffdebbc41a.camel@gnu.org> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 14:39:26 +0100 Message-ID: <87zh3c9mgh.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ZohoMailClient: External Received-SPF: pass client-ip=136.143.188.51; envelope-from=rekado@elephly.net; helo=sender4-of-o51.zoho.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Guix Devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=elephly.net header.s=zoho header.b=A7fyDrz9; arc=reject (signature check failed: fail, {[1] = sig:zohomail.com:reject}); dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.99 X-TUID: Z7yK5FDNxMsf Roel Janssen writes: > On Thu, 2020-11-19 at 22:13 +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> Hi, >>=20 >> > > > http://logs.guix.gnu.org/guix/2020-11-19.log#182349 >> >=20 >> > > Right, so I shouldn't have pushed to "wip-r" in the first place. >> >=20 >> > Well, I think it is a lack of synchronisation between all of 3; >> > especially with this work around via external GitHub upstream. >>=20 >> Yeah, sorry. I didn=E2=80=99t realize wip-r was worked on by any one ot= her than >> simon and myself. The commits are still there, they just don=E2=80=99t = have a >> named pointer (=3D branch) to them any longer: >>=20 >> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/log/?id=3D8ed6a08a998d4abd58e= b67c85699f38f87f76d05 >>=20 >> If that=E2=80=99s the last commit (or if you have another one that was p= ushed) I >> can simply reset the branch pointer to it and then stay out of it :) >>=20 > > This is the most recent commit I pushed: > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/log/?id=3Dea92cec586893748b6de= 32b930117c598225c38c > > It'd be great if you could reset the branch pointer! :) Done! I rebased onto master and pushed to r-wip. > On IRC you noted that the commit messages are wrong. I interpret that as= "my > commit messages are wrong", which I guess will be those where I updated t= he > inputs of packages. Could you tell me how I need to format the commit me= ssages? > Then I can perhaps rewrite the most recent history of the wip-r branch to= fix my > commit messages. Many of the commit messages were incomplete (didn=E2=80=99t mention all cha= nged inputs) and used the wrong heading =E2=80=9Cgnu: Update r-foo to 1.2.3.=E2= =80=9D instead of the more greppable =E2=80=9Cgnu: r-foo: Update to 1.2.3.=E2=80=9D. You can save yourself some time in the future by using ./etc/committer.scm; I strongly recommend it for R package upgrades. (First commit all package additions manually, then run ./etc/committer.scm for all the updates.) I have manually rewritten the commit messages. There are some open questions: the changes to r-mutationalpatterns invalidate the comment ;; These two packages are suggested packages above r-bsgenome-hsapiens-1000genomes-hs37d5 and r-bsgenome-hsapiens-ucsc-hg19. Would be good to adjust the comment or to move it down. I also saw that r-rsubread fails to build. --=20 Ricardo