From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id yCV7GTdydGWiFwEA9RJhRA:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 09 Dec 2023 14:57:11 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id yCV7GTdydGWiFwEA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 09 Dec 2023 14:57:11 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 471B763D94 for ; Sat, 9 Dec 2023 14:57:11 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=tobias.gr header.s=2018 header.b=U3bq4Nqr; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=tobias.gr ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1702130231; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=Egec/+rToSom4vek7oL/u9eHD7TprIPdm0nKSEO2YQI=; b=Pv22gQc+dMM3dQb1ZYondW26Q9XJ1AZy0enWA8lCzKAcq6xj5woVdUc+a4t2PZgfELB07O C38bDdivdBdwfuhgT4xy15YNB3I3Gk6/NzUotojppSfg8/LL3wvmAkLq98qqwOxQs/Iwhy Y+6H6kkI0zE3sg7KIa4jwiM2L8DuJxCfKDSpz467lQSXxoaOI3vR+i8L08jgyqqf0oHICO JEOtLz6TXuAXjf4VuM8u81vcmy3zy6k56uIwH6Ah+IwoJ6vem1LwyHGr9n+2JN3Zbu1Ejg itwKVNgz1tQTGVZwlT2+57k4/2MQOrjX7CiMs5QoZIWd/6srK2B1dpsGQkmCpA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=tobias.gr header.s=2018 header.b=U3bq4Nqr; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=tobias.gr ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1702130231; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Gq3yjjjDslppsG/cLbadXUpscXUx9PXfc9CmUYZ4kwxKlV8fj/iZ99L4pnsIDMbOkoLk3P pZ88/6vCawRezlXz2s+N321B1zDJxm0DW9cD6QvTpzffT30i4SuVoBvnS8g4EPFPCP/Fk1 7cQYxWyOGu9AHE7F77OPjNRsIY+hO2Vwt37VOW8PxlyXxUMLt2oYhX17T6nX2RyD2T+lx1 MEFm3EZWkM8Dy3u14PwFYeEOX7kle0SUkO54ecCn9SKrm1XEnI+U1TYpZpcPeBblU37505 BsiyKuxEy/bGaPfV/UK+Wxhp8OkLdNYHkOLD8CbXXIXXSt6kVTKtUcTFcSqPJQ== Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rBxor-0005Bx-BO; Sat, 09 Dec 2023 08:56:38 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rBxoo-0005BZ-NN; Sat, 09 Dec 2023 08:56:34 -0500 Received: from tobias.gr ([80.241.217.52]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rBxol-0003gw-OW; Sat, 09 Dec 2023 08:56:34 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=2018; bh=Egec/+rToSom4 vek7oL/u9eHD7TprIPdm0nKSEO2YQI=; h=in-reply-to:date:subject:cc:to: from:references; d=tobias.gr; b=U3bq4NqrUTQn3k2AVkdqTivo0rH7KIXjzQ3mel CQKwVKEgndKWblRnDfATVeYz4iunCd3p6UdUMNzMatySnGhL4n5iQIl1Ewn6D5OPDK8oc0 cb6PqMcotiWmmfP4FrnUZj/yrBtT299IIZKxczcybigr+4RHxSgvOSk5fy8f9Sel6Ii00o sbd0YaD0Rjj5HLYRWGrBoHjcyvMpfgRwbPS3Ua51qo68B1qKJ7/WtN9s4AM0pcrP8W2vZe +MynD+uD6NUWTEYE4N1UjhX3xgVRr1E/T2uwMLzcFVq1RKnPBxlNXL31kajnqJ6s+2a1+g 1KK5pzOePr8wcWBoJffX622g== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id ab042bdb (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Sat, 9 Dec 2023 13:56:24 +0000 (UTC) References: <87lea7jtlw.fsf@cbaines.net> <875y177iik.fsf@gnu.org> <87lea3zexr.fsf@cbaines.net> From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice To: Christopher Baines Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , guix-devel@gnu.org, guix-europe-sac@gnu.org, guix-maintainers@gnu.org Subject: Re: Shutting down qa.guix? Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2023 14:30:35 +0100 In-reply-to: <87lea3zexr.fsf@cbaines.net> BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default; Message-ID: <87zfyj7a46.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=80.241.217.52; envelope-from=me@tobias.gr; helo=tobias.gr X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.64 X-Spam-Score: -5.64 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 471B763D94 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-TUID: IGD8bwQ24i+o --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Chris, I agree that Guix should step in to maintain the level of service=20 that QA currently offers, by paying for hosting and sharing=20 responsibility for system administration. Whether the software's maintained or improved is something over=20 which we've historically had very poor control. Things go awry=20 when we pretend otherwise. Christopher Baines =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > it's not the most cost effective setup Has this been explained in more detail before? > I also think that fundamentally I may think that processes and=20 > tooling > to make changes is more important than others regard it to be. The disproportionate amount of effort you've put in, mostly=20 unaided, implies as much. (Proportionally disproportional thanks for that, by the way.) Both > more comments to provide some context for the configuration. and > making some high level architecture diagrams for QA and the=20 > bordeaux > build farm would be very much appreciated! > As for monitoring and responding to problems, that's a bit more > complicated, but in most cases a herd restart of the relevant=20 > bit will > temporarily resolve the issue. Chuffed that the Guix Data Service embodies the same debugging=20 philosophy as the other Guix infrastructure. Kind regards, T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCZXRyCQ0cbWVAdG9iaWFz LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15eQEA/3kGMKLRdGkkhAhCTdrKT1Ta6S+slWjse3rLvubT kC6dAPoC7LIdmguECeTl5ANznb3lVojuhvAxBPELzCDl7fGMAQ== =5UkI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--