From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr>
To: Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net>
Cc: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>,
guix-devel@gnu.org, guix-europe-sac@gnu.org,
guix-maintainers@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Shutting down qa.guix?
Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2023 14:30:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zfyj7a46.fsf@nckx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lea3zexr.fsf@cbaines.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1302 bytes --]
Hi Chris,
I agree that Guix should step in to maintain the level of service
that QA currently offers, by paying for hosting and sharing
responsibility for system administration.
Whether the software's maintained or improved is something over
which we've historically had very poor control. Things go awry
when we pretend otherwise.
Christopher Baines 写道:
> it's not the most cost effective setup
Has this been explained in more detail before?
> I also think that fundamentally I may think that processes and
> tooling
> to make changes is more important than others regard it to be.
The disproportionate amount of effort you've put in, mostly
unaided, implies as much.
(Proportionally disproportional thanks for that, by the way.)
Both
> more comments to provide some context for the configuration.
and
> making some high level architecture diagrams for QA and the
> bordeaux
> build farm
would be very much appreciated!
> As for monitoring and responding to problems, that's a bit more
> complicated, but in most cases a herd restart of the relevant
> bit will
> temporarily resolve the issue.
Chuffed that the Guix Data Service embodies the same debugging
philosophy as the other Guix infrastructure.
Kind regards,
T G-R
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 247 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-09 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-06 13:32 November/December update on qa.guix.gnu.org and related things Christopher Baines
2023-12-09 10:39 ` Discontinuing data.guix.gnu.org? Ludovic Courtès
2023-12-09 11:14 ` Christopher Baines
2024-01-09 18:12 ` Ludovic Courtès
2024-01-09 18:33 ` Julien Lepiller
2024-01-09 19:19 ` Gábor Boskovits
2024-01-10 0:38 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-12-09 10:54 ` Shutting down qa.guix? Ludovic Courtès
2023-12-09 12:16 ` Christopher Baines
2023-12-09 13:30 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice [this message]
2023-12-10 10:54 ` Christopher Baines
2023-12-10 16:05 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-12-11 13:30 ` Christopher Baines
2023-12-10 18:50 ` Simon Tournier
2023-12-13 16:43 ` RFC (was Re: Shutting down qa.guix?) Simon Tournier
2024-01-18 12:39 ` [Guix-europe-sac] Shutting down qa.guix? Andreas Enge
2024-01-20 12:57 ` Christopher Baines
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-12-14 13:38 Jing
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zfyj7a46.fsf@nckx \
--to=me@tobias.gr \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=guix-europe-sac@gnu.org \
--cc=guix-maintainers@gnu.org \
--cc=ludo@gnu.org \
--cc=mail@cbaines.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).