From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: icu4c: Upgrade to 52.1 Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:15:43 -0500 Message-ID: <87y519o8io.fsf@netris.org> References: <87a9dpq4uu.fsf@netris.org> <87txbxd7od.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41378) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFTgE-0006nF-Ke for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:16:43 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFTg9-0006xJ-5v for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:16:38 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87txbxd7od.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Mon, 17 Feb 2014 17:29:22 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Mark H Weaver skribis: > >> From bb44edacf768c8308f7d64ad16a10ca9c924469d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Mark H Weaver >> Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 16:38:00 -0500 >> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: icu4c: Upgrade to 52.1. >> >> * gnu/packages/icu4c.scm (icu4c): Upgrade to 52.1. > > OK to push, but rather on =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99 to limit rebuild= s, as discussed > yesterday. FWIW, the 'patchelf' fix will trigger a rebuild of icu4c anyway. So it would cause no additional work if these two commits were simultaneously pushed to 'master'. Alternatively, they could both be pushed to core-updates only. I need the 'patchelf' fix now, but I can keep that on my local branch off master, I suppose. What do you think? Mark