From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add guile-emacs!
Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 12:13:14 +0200
Message-ID: <87y4kq2lol.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87r3qo5idm.fsf@earlgrey.lan> <873830f2m0.fsf@earlgrey.lan>
	<87wq0bh70o.fsf@gmail.com> <87vbfvdugp.fsf@earlgrey.lan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39680)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1YtCcL-00067Q-8I
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 May 2015 06:13:22 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1YtCcI-0005lY-2I
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 May 2015 06:13:21 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:55130)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1YtCcI-0005lU-0B
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 May 2015 06:13:18 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87vbfvdugp.fsf@earlgrey.lan> (Christopher Allan Webber's message
	of "Thu, 14 May 2015 10:53:43 -0500")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Christopher Allan Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org>
Cc: Guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

Christopher Allan Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org> skribis:

> Taylan Ulrich Kammer writes:
>
>> Christopher Allan Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org> writes:
>>
>>> Okay, how about a version of guile-emacs that works and incorporates
>>> feedback from this thread?  Yeah?  Anyone?
>>>
>>> Whoooooooooo guile-emacs! :)
>>
>> Yay! :-)
>>
>> I would have thought these would go to guile.scm and emacs.scm.  What do
>> others think?
>
> It can be done... since guile-for-guile-emacs doesn't make sense without
> guile-emacs (probably), I thought maybe bundling them together makes
> sense...

Either way is fine with me.

I guess with this last round of comments it=E2=80=99s going to be in shape =
to
get in!

Thank you!

Ludo=E2=80=99.