From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] system: container: Update to new service API.
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 23:00:58 +0100
Message-ID: <87y4el49np.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87611txiw7.fsf@izanagi.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<CAJ=RwfYUjpkiYVT_Aou=c8scQCWBza_b+SwrY8w4ReZ7QYkxHw@mail.gmail.com>
	<87k2q8v42g.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAJ=RwfYfrSiqhXaPhi5iQEj7KavDZBPS6UT_1rK9QHKmBwjrZg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38811)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1ZrvFo-0007Hk-HA
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 18:01:05 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1ZrvFl-0005k1-Ay
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 18:01:04 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAJ=RwfYfrSiqhXaPhi5iQEj7KavDZBPS6UT_1rK9QHKmBwjrZg@mail.gmail.com>
	(David Thompson's message of "Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:19:00 -0400")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: "Thompson, David" <dthompson2@worcester.edu>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

"Thompson, David" <dthompson2@worcester.edu> skribis:

> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> wrot=
e:
>> Sorry, I meant to preserve #:container? behavior but I forgot this bit.
>>
>> I believe the attached patch provides an Even Greater Way to address the
>> problem, namely by making the modprobe/firmware thing an optional
>> service.
>>
>> Could you try and report back?  I tried it in a VM and there=E2=80=99s no
>> regression.
>
> It works great, thanks!

Applied!

Ludo=E2=80=99.